We performed a comparison between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE EVA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)."The initial setup was straightforward."
"The features which are most valuable are the availability of the system and the management."
"The predictive analytics, where we're getting notifications prior to a failure has been helpful."
"You can scale it out almost indefinitely."
"The most valuable feature of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is its online upgrades."
"If you design it right and implement it right, it's headache free. Just keep it there and it does what it's suppose to do."
"This is a very robust product and it offers everything that we are looking for."
"It has improved uptime, as well as speed to delivery."
"There have been no fail-stop failures for the last five years."
"It is very stable."
"HPE has reliable support for HDD replacement."
"The GUI was a little hard to figure out how to use."
"We've started to see an issue with the older models that we have. We've had issues where facilities would have unscheduled power outages or scheduled power outages and the 3PARs weren't able to come up successfully. We actually had an incident recently where it wiped data that we didn't anticipate would be wiped."
"We would also like to see improvements to the ease of administration of 3PAR."
"Generally, the management of the multiple systems that we have is really the only problem, always having to go to all these separate tools to manage everything."
"Our support in the US has been phenomenal, no issues at all. But the European support was poor initially."
"The cloud-based monitoring Infosight would be better if users are automatically enrolled in the cloud/group based on the configuration or information gathered or uploaded on the internet."
"Security is a mandatory feature because our customer needs to protect delicate information."
"File Persona can be better. I don't use File Persona because it has many problems with my environment. The antivirus that it has is not compatible with File Persona, and that's a big issue with File Persona. 3PAR is not as good as Dell when making a file in the storage. 3PAR for a block is very good, but when comparing row capacity, I get 14% capacity with 3PAR, but with Dell, I get 60% capacity."
"Performance could probably be improve with faster controllers, but it is already an old device. We do have performance problems now, but it is a rather old device, so we have what we have."
Earn 20 points
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is ranked 3rd in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 299 reviews while HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). HPE 3PAR StoreServ is rated 8.6, while HPE EVA is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE 3PAR StoreServ writes "The product's technical support is outstanding as I can reach someone right away". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "There is reliable support for HDD replacement". HPE 3PAR StoreServ is most compared with HPE Primera, Dell Unity XT, HPE Nimble Storage, NetApp AFF and Lenovo ThinkSystem DE Series, whereas HPE EVA is most compared with HPE StorageWorks MSA.
See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.
We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.