HPE Apollo vs PowerEdge C comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
415 views|321 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Dell Technologies Logo
267 views|195 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE Apollo and PowerEdge C based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Density Optimized Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed HPE Apollo vs. PowerEdge C Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The cost benefit of this solution is most valuable. It is quite effective for the work for which we are using it. We are mainly running video servers on these, and we are quite happy with the resilience, density storage, and streaming capacity of the system.""It's pretty flexible. You can choose how much storage you put on the server. You can have one to three nodes, depending on whether you want more CPU or storage.""Absolutely being able to mount into Omni-Path architecture, HFIs on those nodes, because we were the very first site in the world""HPE Apollo's support is the most valuable feature.""HPE Apollo's pricing is low, and implementation is very easy compared to other products.""we can use the same platform for several use cases: Hadoop, Ceph, and we are considering the server for another use case right now. It's a single solution, we only have to integrate it once and we can use it for several technologies.""We're going to buy another Apollo 6500. We may configure it with half the number of GPUs because that may be all we need. In a sense, we can see the Apollo 6500 being so powerful that we only need half the GPU capability that we have now.""Apollo Systems provide stuff that standard services do not. More HTDs, more compute power, at very reasonable pricing."

More HPE Apollo Pros →

"With the tool, we can easily upgrade and ensure compatibility between operating systems, hardwares and drivers. Among other features, the hardware also stands out because it is certified and aligns with the processor manufacturers like Intel. This enables them to offer the latest options which are not available with other suppliers.""PowerEdge C is the best server I have worked with. I like that it's user-friendly. PowerEdge C performs very well.""It is a scalable solution.""The initial setup is not complex. It's a user-friendly tool.""It's a good product. Virtualization on it is good.""The product has high performance and no downtime.""One of the main features that attract customers to buy their products is the great management tool and almost zero failure rate, making it easy to use.""The scalability of the solution met our needs."

More PowerEdge C Pros →

Cons
"What's coming out in Gen 10 is very strong in terms of additional security.""HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved.""We would like to see improved cooling because that is quite an issue. If you put that much compute power into a single rack, cooling really becomes an issue. And there is room for improvement there.""We would like to see SimpliVity on top of the Apollo.""If there could be some training for our team, we would be better equipped to promote and support HPE Apollo.""The predictive analysis feature could be improved.""I would want to see the flexibility of being able to run various network protocols including InfiniBand, Fibre Channel, as well as iSCSI, with iSCSI going up to 100 gigabytes per second -that would be outstanding.""We are quite happy with it, but its price and storage density can be better."

More HPE Apollo Cons →

"Its customer service could be better.""It should be improved in terms of future expansion. We should be able to have additional free slots for future extensions in terms of memory.""The solution’s pricing could be cheaper.""The product’s pricing could be a little cheaper.""There is some trouble with the stability part of the product, making it an area where improvements are required.""A feature that needs to be added is the ability for full container storage.""It would be better if the solution provided simplified storage and hardware with an integrated one-tier architecture.""The price must be improved."

More PowerEdge C Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Obviously I would like to see the cost go down. That speaks for itself."
  • "The price of the solution is more expensive than Dell which is their main competitor. However, there are times we have managed to receive a comparable price."
  • "There is an annual license required to use HPE Apollo."
  • "It is an expensive solution but it is worth the money. The standard licensing cost is for the GPU and the features that someone is using. There are additional charges but they depend on the solution."
  • "Compared to other products, HPE Apollo is not an expensive solution."
  • More HPE Apollo Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "PowerEdge C is very expensive, but personally, I think it's worth the price."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "When we talk about pricing it is the cheapest on the market that I have found."
  • "The cost depends on the configuration."
  • "We buy licenses for the solution's advanced features."
  • "Despite the slightly higher price, we prefer Dell due to the high quality of their products."
  • "PowerEdge C is a reasonably priced product, and the pricing depends on how many years you need the product. The cost also includes the support."
  • "The licensing cost of PowerEdge C is very high."
  • More PowerEdge C Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Density Optimized Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:HPE Apollo's pricing is low, and implementation is very easy compared to other products.
    Top Answer:HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved. The solution should provide fast delivery when it comes to replacing a particular product that is under warranty.
    Top Answer:We use HPE Apollo for specific requirements of Linux servers.
    Top Answer:With the tool, we can easily upgrade and ensure compatibility between operating systems, hardwares and drivers. Among other features, the hardware also stands out because it is certified and aligns… more »
    Top Answer:There has been an increase in quality issues.
    Ranking
    Views
    415
    Comparisons
    321
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    267
    Comparisons
    195
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    340
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP Apollo Systems, HP ProLiant SL, HP Apollo
    Learn More
    Overview

    The HPE Apollo high-density server family is built for the highest levels of performance and efficiency. They are rack-scale compute, storage, networking, power and cooling – massively scale-up and scale-out – solutions for your big data analytics, object storage and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads. From water-cooling that’s 1,000X more efficient than air, to “right-sized scaling” with 2X the compute density for workgroup and private cloud workloads, the HPE Apollo line is a dense, high-performance, tiered approach for organisations of all sizes.

    PowerEdge C help you to maximize hyperscale performance with up to 4 independent server nodes, flexible storage and shared infrastructure in a compact 2U chassis.

    Sample Customers
    Weta Digital
    NxtGen Datacenter, Medien-Service Untermain (MSU), Exasol, IndigoVision, Dayco
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Insurance Company18%
    Construction Company18%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Wholesaler/Distributor9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    HPE Apollo vs. PowerEdge C
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Apollo vs. PowerEdge C and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE Apollo is ranked 1st in Density Optimized Servers with 22 reviews while PowerEdge C is ranked 2nd in Density Optimized Servers with 23 reviews. HPE Apollo is rated 8.4, while PowerEdge C is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HPE Apollo writes "An affordable and easy-to-implement solution, but its after-sales support and technical support should be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PowerEdge C writes "Easy to deploy and has high performance and no downtime". HPE Apollo is most compared with HPE ProLiant DL Servers, Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge FX and Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers, whereas PowerEdge C is most compared with Huawei FusionServer X Series, Dell PowerEdge M and Cisco UCS B-Series. See our HPE Apollo vs. PowerEdge C report.

    See our list of best Density Optimized Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Density Optimized Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.