HPE BladeSystem vs HPE Synergy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
3,782 views|2,784 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
4,758 views|3,441 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Apr 3, 2022

We performed a comparison between HPE Blade system and HPE Synergy based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users of HPE Bladesystem say the setup was a bit complex initially and could be simplified. While the deployment of HPE Synergy is very quick, some users find it complex and have issues with configurations.
  • Features: Bladesystem’s most valuable features, according to our reviewers, are ease of management, scalability and stability. Users say Bladesystem is very easy to use. However, the product is being discontinued, so this constitutes a downside. Other disadvantages include it being difficult to replicate virtual machines and issues with virtual connections. Synergy users say the solution has great data storage and is built very well. It is stable, versatile and scalable. The downsides include issues with the firmware, and that it is not very suitable for hybrid environments.
  • Pricing: Users of both solutions feel the prices are affordable.

  • Service and Support: Bladesystem users say the level of technical support varies according to region and that it needs improvement in responding quickly to tickets. On the other hand, Synergy users find the technical support to be excellent.

Comparison Results: Based on the parameters we compared, HPE Synergy is a better choice. Our reviewers find that Synergy offers better support, stability and scalability, and it is worth the complex setup.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Synergy Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"HPE BladeSystem is a scalable solution. It is a composable infrastructure which we can manage our external services. This is the one factor which I can see the server is much more suitable for the OneView console.""The most valuable feature of HPE BladeSystem is simplified management.""The benefit is the density and the capability for global harmonization on the hardware, because all the hardware chassis are the same. We can also purchase the same network cards too, chassis by chassis, so it gives us a global solution.""It is a stable, dependable solution.""This has drastically reduced our datacenter space, has good cooling and power consumption.""Its ease of management, consolidation, connectivity, power, and cooling are the most valuable features.""I really appreciate the integrated Onboard Administrator, the iLO (Integrated Lights-Out) modular network, and the SAN Switches.""It is very stable."

More HPE BladeSystem Pros →

"It is a good product for hypervisors.""There is no problem with the scalability.""The product enables the centralization of all administrative tasks.""The solution has decreased our deployment time by 10 to 20 percent.""Valuable features include its dependability, reliability, and the ease of managing the system.""We're able to provision different applications, different demonstrations, add cloud-like speeds on-prem, which is unheard of in the industry.""Composability... We show our partners the value of composability and how it can meet their needs.""The solution help us to implement new business requirements quickly, since it is easy and quick to upgrade our capacity."

More HPE Synergy Pros →

Cons
"If you compare it with Lenovo systems, the pricing is too high.""It may be coming to its end of life.""BladeSystem is an old-fashioned server and not very well developed for new features and new areas of data centers, which is not very good for enterprise companies.""I rate the stability of HPE BladeSystem a nine out of ten.""The interface in terms of management could be much more intuitive.""I would like to see the upgrade path a little bit smoother.""It would be nice if the solution were cheaper.""I'd like to see an all-in-one packet in the future."

More HPE BladeSystem Cons →

"After delivering the contract, they became a little less active. So, it needs some pushing from my side sometimes.""Technical support was time consuming and unsatisfactory. The initial product setup was complex, lasing around three weeks to a month.""The post-sales activity needs improvement. There is some sort of convoluted spreadsheet that you have to fill in prior to the platform being delivered. It seems a little bit out-of-date and inefficient. Surely, there is some sort of web page configuration tool online that a customer could use. Then, it could be validated by somebody else, like a partner or HPE technical resource, then that would be a lot more efficient.""The initial setup was complex. It was slow and just didn't work. Even HPE couldn't make it work for 45 days.""I would like it to connect to the HPE Cloud Connect compute platform for simplicity of our infrastructure.""HPE Synergy could improve its remote support.""Synergy could probably do some code enhancements to simplify the deployment a bit more.""They must improve the OneView tools."

More HPE Synergy Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Their licensing program is pretty simple."
  • "With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."
  • "The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."
  • "Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."
  • "​The price could be cheaper."
  • "The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."
  • "It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."
  • "It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."
  • More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The Nutanix platform came in a little more expensive than the Synergy."
  • "The solution has reduced our IT infrastructure costs because we have had to buy less services than we used to."
  • "In our whole environment, the cost is in the millions. On this particular chassis, the annual cost is 12 blades times approximately $40,000."
  • "The biggest cost is the VMware licensing."
  • "We do a biannual renewal. I know how much that renewal is, but I don't know how much it breaks down to be just Synergy, since we have our VMware, all of our physical equipment, etc. all rolled up into one renewal, which is a little over $300,000 every two years. However, only a subset of that is the Synergy product."
  • "There was at least about a 20 percent savings in cost over our purchase based on the purchase price of the compute modules themselves versus what we've had to pay before. It was significantly less."
  • "Synergy has lowered our total cost of ownership significantly. I would say ballpark around 25 percent, maybe more."
  • "We bought everything outright to start with. We don't do much consumption-based stuff."
  • More HPE Synergy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.
    Top Answer:It is a good product for hypervisors.
    Top Answer:You have to propose Synergy with your customer base.
    Top Answer:Using HPE Transporters instead of train switches would simplify network configuration by creating a flat network without zoning between servers and storage, fostering tighter integration.
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    3,782
    Comparisons
    2,784
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    409
    Rating
    8.9
    1st
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    4,758
    Comparisons
    3,441
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
    Learn More
    Overview
    HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

    HPE Synergy, the first platform built from the ground up for Composable Infrastructure, offers an experience that empowers IT to create and deliver new value instantly and continuously. It is a single infrastructure that reduces operational complexity for traditional workloads and increases operational velocity for the new breed of applications and services. Through a single interface, HPE Synergy composes physical and virtual compute, storage, and fabric pools into any configuration for any application. As an extensible platform, it easily enables a broad range of applications and operational models such as virtualization, hybrid cloud, and DevOps. With HPE Synergy, IT can become not just the internal service provider but the business partner to rapidly launch new applications that become the business.

    Sample Customers
    EMIS Health
    HudsonAlpha, Virgin Media, EMIS, United
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Insurance Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Synergy
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Synergy and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 134 reviews while HPE Synergy is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 85 reviews. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6, while HPE Synergy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Synergy writes "Local hard drives are not needed for the i3S module that boots to any operating system". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with Cisco UCS B-Series, Dell PowerEdge M, Super Micro SuperBlade, HPE Superdome X and Pure Storage FlashBlade, whereas HPE Synergy is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Apollo, HPE Superdome X and HPE ProLiant DL Servers. See our HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Synergy report.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.