HPE ConvergedSystem vs Oracle SuperCluster comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
1,263 views|744 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
367 views|140 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE ConvergedSystem and Oracle SuperCluster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Converged Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed HPE ConvergedSystem vs. Oracle SuperCluster Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of HPE ConvergedSystem are scalability and resilience.""The most valuable features of the solution are the flexibility and the availability of the machines.""This solution is very simple to use.""Consolidation and duplications features.""The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to restore lost machines. Essentially its high availability capabilities are extremely valuable to us.""This is a scalable solution. Our customers begin with an initial configuration and later add more servers, memory and other options to meet the demands of increased processing.""The user interface, reporting, and management are good, and we are quite happy with the performance.""The tool's most valuable features are stability and scalability."

More HPE ConvergedSystem Pros →

"SuperCluster is basically a combination of Oracle, with Exadata and Compute node features, so it is a computing cluster that is integrated in a single infrastructure such that we don't need a separate solution for the application database, the data storage database, and everything else the application needs.""In this setup, the traffic is distributed among the nodes, enhancing the overall performance compared to a scenario where all traffic is directed to a single server.""Unix is not as easy for the users, it needs more maintenance and costs extra.""Because SuperCluster is a specially engineered system, we have confidence in that all the components are compatible with one another. Everything runs together as a well-coupled group of machines, and the performance is great (especially the memory).""The two features that I find to be the most valuable are high availability and high performance.""Scalability and technical support.""A valuable feature is the Exadata Storage appliance, optimized for database queries.""The performance is significantly improved, and the administration is easy because it is a single platform end-to-end."

More Oracle SuperCluster Pros →

Cons
"HPE ConvergedSystem needs to improve its price.""There is some scope for improvement in support. The response time could be better.""The tool has shortcomings in its performance monitoring part.""I would like to see better manageability and integration with third-party tools.""Perhaps they can work on providing faster allocation of memory or storage.""I would like to see monitoring solutions included, as well as brand support.""This is an expensive solution.""The interface is not fully integrated with the ESXi, which is something that could be improved."

More HPE ConvergedSystem Cons →

"They may have made some improvements but based on the version that I am using, it is a little complicated because it is based on the Unix Operating system.""I would like to see control domain and zone management via a management console, similar to that of OVM.""There are many areas for improvement. For example, better guidance in terms of troubleshooting issues relating to ZFS, as well as better tools/diagnostics for monitoring that specific component, to better identify potential issues. Hardware monitoring via OEM 13.2 is not 100 percent, as Ops Center is still required in some instances.""If it had capabilities to integrate really well with DB2 or SQL Server or Hitachi SANs, those sort of things, that would be a real benefit. Right now, it's fully supported only under all Oracle infrastructure.""Not a very user friendly solution.""We have faced network connectivity issues.""It's not working as we expected. We thought it would be fast and reliable but we are not getting the reliability. It's not stable.""If they had an application that centralized the administration, not about the monitoring, but for the configuration, it would be better."

More Oracle SuperCluster Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good. We have not calculated what hyper-converged infrastructure has brought us but I think there has to be some lower cost for us, compared to the public cloud. Obviously, there would be a lower cost, probably by more than half."
  • "This is an expensive system and not every customer has the kind of budget to support it."
  • "The pricing is sensitive."
  • "This is an expensive solution."
  • "My company has a five year contract for HPE ConvergedSystem. The contracts depend on companies and sometimes it can be three years. The solution is worth its price."
  • "There are some extra costs in addition to the licensing costs for the yearly maintenance from professional third-party services."
  • "The tool's licensing costs are yearly."
  • "The pricing is competitive. Not a major problem. We have a subscription model."
  • More HPE ConvergedSystem Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "For us, the licensing costs are a large amount, but we are also paying for the rack, the SLA, and other extras. When I look into our organization's requirements regarding performance, machine load, etc., I believe that, while expensive, SuperCluster is nevertheless good for us."
  • "Due to the multiple products involved in our use of SuperCluster (including different software, hardware, etc.), I cannot comment on the licensing aspect."
  • More Oracle SuperCluster Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Converged Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the solution are the flexibility and the availability of the machines.
    Top Answer:I rate the product price an eight and a half on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:Pricing is an area of concern in the solution where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:In this setup, the traffic is distributed among the nodes, enhancing the overall performance compared to a scenario where all traffic is directed to a single server.
    Top Answer:Due to the multiple products involved in our use of SuperCluster (including different software, hardware, etc.), I cannot comment on the licensing aspect.
    Top Answer:We have faced network connectivity issues.
    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    1,263
    Comparisons
    744
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    408
    Rating
    8.3
    7th
    Views
    367
    Comparisons
    140
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    543
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HPE ConvergedSystem 700, HPE ConvergedSystem for SAP HANA, CS500, HPE ConvergedSystem 900, HPE ConvergedSystem 500, HPE ConvergedSystem 300
    Oracle MiniCluster, S7-2, M7, M6-32
    Learn More
    Overview

    HPE ConvergedSystem gives you lower cost of ownership and greater flexibility to meet more business demands. Eliminate the inefficiencies and inflexibility of one-silo-at-a-time infrastructure with software-defined agility and automation.

    Deploy pre-validated, factory-tested configurations in weeks instead of months. Set up IT services in minutes, not hours. Integrated, workload-optimised systems eliminate infrastructure silos for improved efficiency, simplicity and speed.

    Secure cloud infrastructure with the industry’s most advanced security, extreme performance, and a complete suite of efficiency enhancements, tools, and automation that work together to dramatically lower cost and complexity.

    Sample Customers
    FAW-Volkswagen, NICS, NBrIX, Pinpoint, HPE Technology Services, SWS, Ko Sistem, HPE
    Advania, Dimension Data, Atos, Etisilat Nigeria, HDFC, Specialized Bicycle Components, Uganda Revenue Authority, iQor, United Energy, Portic Barcelona, B Logistics, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, CSC, CNSI, REDISA
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Consumer Goods Company14%
    Pharma/Biotech Company14%
    University7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Government8%
    Educational Organization7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Government22%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Logistics Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government17%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Non Profit8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise83%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    HPE ConvergedSystem vs. Oracle SuperCluster
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE ConvergedSystem vs. Oracle SuperCluster and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE ConvergedSystem is ranked 3rd in Converged Infrastructure with 21 reviews while Oracle SuperCluster is ranked 7th in Converged Infrastructure with 12 reviews. HPE ConvergedSystem is rated 8.4, while Oracle SuperCluster is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of HPE ConvergedSystem writes "With good integration and expansion capabilities, the tool also offers good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SuperCluster writes "Great performance all round, but lacking in certain cloud features". HPE ConvergedSystem is most compared with Dell PowerEdge VRTX, Dell VxBlock System, Oracle Private Cloud Appliance and FlexPod XCS, whereas Oracle SuperCluster is most compared with Oracle Private Cloud Appliance. See our HPE ConvergedSystem vs. Oracle SuperCluster report.

    See our list of best Converged Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Converged Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.