We performed a comparison between HPE ProLiant DL Servers and Huawei KunLun Mission Critical Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Lenovo and others in Rack Servers."HPE ProLiant DL Servers have good performance and they support different types of applications."
"The technical support from HPE ProLiant DL Servers is very good. We can contact them through various means and they are responsive, they are quick."
"The product is scalable and stable."
"The quality and the technical support are the most valuable features."
"Very practical and easy to maintain."
"The most valuable features of HPE ProLiant DL Servers are convenience and the interface is good."
"We have had no issues with the stability of the product."
"The speed of the backups and having the system be immune to ransomware are the main advantages."
"Features like partitions are useful."
"The implementation should be simplified, it is not straightforward."
"It's scalable but we are switching to workstation for some software because the CPU speed isn't fast enough anymore."
"They are pretty solid servers, but, just like all servers, they become obsolete after some time. They can maybe provide a console to monitor the health of the servers. There should be some kind of console to which you can log in to remotely check on the health of a server, even when the server is off. The servers that we have are only scalable to some extent. They have got a limited amount of hard drive that you can insert. Their scalability should be improved."
"The pricing of the solution is high compared to other products."
"It would be great if HP could use a ProLiant Server to run HP-UX, the Unix build from HPE. Right now, HP-UX cannot run on the ProLiant architecture."
"The solution could improve by providing more best practices from an architectural point of view. What are some recommended configurations for use, such as in a VM environment? HP provides some best practices but they are based on VMware, not on Red Hat. It would benefit for others to see the different use cases. How the HPE ProLiant DL Servers were used in the context of Red hat virtualization, and some configurations as an example to allow us to identify some points that we can improve in our platform. We could make our system more reliable and scalable."
"The solution should work to be more scalable."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"Support can be better."
Earn 20 points
HPE ProLiant DL Servers is ranked 2nd in Rack Servers with 156 reviews while Huawei KunLun Mission Critical Server is ranked 15th in Rack Servers. HPE ProLiant DL Servers is rated 8.6, while Huawei KunLun Mission Critical Server is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HPE ProLiant DL Servers writes "Good availability and management console with good reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei KunLun Mission Critical Server writes "A good server with useful features like partitions". HPE ProLiant DL Servers is most compared with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers, HPE Apollo, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers and IBM Power Systems, whereas Huawei KunLun Mission Critical Server is most compared with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers.
See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.
We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
