We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most important is that the solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"The tool is easy to manage."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"The analytic solution is good and should be improving further."
"Provides great coverage and performance."
"It’s reliable."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"It's highly scalable as long as the licenses are in place. You can expand it easily."
"The solution is easy to use and offers good management for wireless."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution."
"The stability provided is very nice."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"In comparison to Cambium, I find Cambium to be more robust in terms of performance."
"There could be more power supply for the radio features."
"I would like to see IoT device support available with WiFi six. IoT is used by all businesses. They are now using IoT devices. It is required."
"The captive portal should be more customizable because right now, it is very limited."
"I have been working with WiFi for more than 17 years. I am not able to convince customers because of the pricing of the solution. Otherwise, we could have sold lots of this tool to the customers."
"Of course, we'd always like it to be cheaper, but that's for every product."
"What needs improvement in Ruckus Wireless WAN is the initial setup. It could be easier. Availability is also another area for improvement in the product. Another huge disadvantage of Ruckus Wireless WAN is the cost you must continuously pay for the licenses."
"Pricing could be improved in Ruckus Wireless WAN because obviously, everybody wants things to become cheaper. Another room for improvement in the product is from a delivery perspective, particularly the heavy delivery delays because of the chip shortage that a lot of manufacturers have to deal with. The chip shortage is not coming to an end, but Ruckus Networks has to make a plan because the ETA has slipped out from the average of three months on switches to fourteen months, which is very, very rough on the industry at the moment. Ruckus Wireless WAN could lose business to Chinese competitors, for example, HTC has a good wireless solution that I haven't tested yet, other than on POC, and it works great. I haven't yet experienced the HTC wireless solution in large deployments, so you never know how it's going to go, but HTC has managed to circumvent the chip shortage, so the ETA provided by HTC is much more preferred than the ETAs provided by Ruckus Networks, Cisco, and Aruba products."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 8th in Wireless WAN with 17 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
