We performed a comparison between Huawei Enterprise Routers and VMware SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two WAN Edge solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers good customer support and good performance."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It is a robust and efficient solution."
"The scalability is good."
"There is a lot of information available about routers and how to configure Huawei Routers right now."
"The product is good, easy to manage , and works fine."
"Internet access is a good feature."
"The product has valuable support services."
"The most valuable feature of VMware SD-WAN is flexibility. It is more flexible than other vendors."
"One of the standout features is its ability to dynamically manage enterprise networks based on applications."
"The most valuable feature is load balancing."
"The service they provide is very stable and is the main influencer of why customers purchase this solution."
"They make use of a combination of different internet lines, which improves quality."
"The most valuable feature of VMware SD-WAN is security. Additionally, the integration and configuration are easier to do than with other solutions, such as Cisco."
"Initially, we had a scattered environment, but VMware SD-WAN helped us achieve centralization, which was beneficial."
"VMware SD-WAN is scalable."
"Lacks sufficient market availability."
"The product’s performance could be better."
"The only problem I see is configuration loss."
"Syntax in the implementation process could be easier to understand for a new user or someone who doesn’t have prior experience using the product."
"There isn't really any scalability potential."
"The internet service for enterprise bundle should be improved."
"We have encountered issues while integrating the product with Enterprise Management Systems. Huawei platform is good for Huawei but we face issues when we integrate it with other models."
"If Huawei can use its own OEM processor, it could be a good step up for future use in the network devices."
"VeloCloud could improve its integration capabilities with other solutions."
"Better price model would be appreciated."
"I would like to improve the tool’s cloud security features. I would like to see high-throughput hardware requests in the product’s next release. The solution should also support multiple gigs which could be around ten."
"In an upcoming release, the solution can be more functional and have additional features."
"The product should have on-demand tunnels instead of fixed tunnels."
"Implementing VMware is much more difficult, time-consuming, and expensive than implementing Fortinet or Check Point."
"The cost of VeloCloud could be lowered."
"They should provide us with the flexibility to scale up."
Huawei Enterprise Routers is ranked 8th in WAN Edge with 24 reviews while VMware SD-WAN is ranked 4th in WAN Edge with 50 reviews. Huawei Enterprise Routers is rated 7.8, while VMware SD-WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Huawei Enterprise Routers writes "A stable and easy-to-manage solution with good security and firewalls". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SD-WAN writes "To fully utilize cloud vendors' hardware networking, Microsoft and VMware support everything". Huawei Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco SD-WAN and Cisco Cloud Services Router, whereas VMware SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform. See our Huawei Enterprise Routers vs. VMware SD-WAN report.
See our list of best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all WAN Edge reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
