We performed a comparison between Infor dEPM and Oracle Hyperion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Infor dEPM's got the best end-user reporting solution that keeps us motivated and moving forward with this solution only."
"The planning capability is the most valuable feature."
"You can get the data directly from the database with Excel formulas."
"Our customers have the solution deployed on the cloud or on-premises. The deployment took about a month."
"It's very easy to use and the functionality is quite complete."
"This solution provides a more structured methodology for doing analysis than a tool like Excel. It creates a central database that keeps all information in one place."
"The most valuable features are those associated with modules and SP, IT in this space, planning, HFM, and PME."
"Oracle Hyperion has helped make things work faster in our company."
"We like the reporting and tracking of financials."
"The stability is fine and quite user friendly."
"Since it is an enterprise-capable solution, people are not worried about security, giving data, the ability to manage complex consolidation, and its ability to modify reporting."
"The latest cloud version is more efficient for financial implementations."
"The latest version has been cloud-enabled, but it requires a deeper understanding of programming skills compared to the previous versions, which were more user-friendly."
"The initial setup from a user perspective can be cumbersome and has room for improvement."
"It's a very expensive solution."
"The usability could be better."
"The analytical side of the product could be better and needs to be improved."
"We are still having some issues with the ASO Cube. It can take a long time to clear the data in the ASO Cube compared to BSO data-clearing operations. We don't have a specific calculation in the ASO, and we only have these aggregate options on the ASO side. If we need calculations, we have to calculate them in the BSO and pass the data to the ASO Cube for the reporting. That's one of the drawbacks. Oracle could also improve on the data logging side as well."
"Oracle EPM Cloud solutions have simplified the security model. Nevertheless, it would be better having a more differentiated security model."
"I have a problem with Hyperion when I need to log some changes in the budget. It's hard to know who made which changes in the budget."
"There's something known as a data block that Hyperion generates for each and every transaction. Sometimes it does not generate and we need to identify those issues and fix them manually."
"What I like is to have everything on one platform and not in different modules like Oracle Hyperion."
"From a technical perspective, the technical support could be improved and the price could be reduced."
"The forecasting of values could be simplified in this solution."
Infor dEPM is ranked 15th in Business Performance Management with 12 reviews while Oracle Hyperion is ranked 2nd in Business Performance Management with 49 reviews. Infor dEPM is rated 7.8, while Oracle Hyperion is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Infor dEPM writes "Good report management, highly stable, and customizable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Hyperion writes "A world-class solution that provides a lot of functionality out of the box and also allows you to customize it to meet your needs". Infor dEPM is most compared with Jedox, Domo, IBM Cognos and IBM Planning Analytics, whereas Oracle Hyperion is most compared with Tableau, Anaplan, IBM Cognos, Oracle HFM and SAS Activity-Based Management. See our Infor dEPM vs. Oracle Hyperion report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
