We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Data and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can model the data there, connect the data models with the business processes and create data lineage processes."
"The most valuable feature of IBM Cloud Pak for Data is the Modeler flows. The ability to develop models using a graphical approach and the capability to connect to various sources, as well as the data virtualization capabilities, allow me to easily access and utilize data that is dispersed across different sources."
"Cloud Pak's most valuable features are IBM MQ, IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, and ISPF."
"The most valuable features of IBM Cloud Pak for Data are the Watson Studio, where we can initiate more groups and write code. Additionally, Watson Machine Learning is available with many other services, such as APIs which you can plug the machine learning models."
"One of Cloud Pak's best features is the Watson Knowledge Catalog, which helps you implement data governance."
"DataStage allows me to connect to different data sources."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten."
"It is a scalable solution, and we have had no issues with its scalability in our company. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten."
"GoldenGate can connect and collect data from multiple sources, such as SQL Server."
"Ease of installation, maintenance and powerful outputs and supporting Big Data and Cloud environment as well as OGGCS (Oracle Golden Gate Cloud Service)."
"What I have found the most valuable about GoldenGate is that it does real-time and no-downtime migrations. Its migrations are fast. There are not many tools like it on the marketplace."
"CDC is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of Oracle GoldenGate are the schema application and performance."
"This solution has a well-known procedure for troubleshooting and tuning the performance, providing for smooth operation."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The product's microservice architecture is scalable."
"The technical support could be a little better."
"The solution could have more connectors."
"One thing that bugs me is how much infrastructure Cloud Pak requires for the initial deployment. It doesn't allow you to start small. The smallest permitted deployment is too big. It's a huge problem that prevents us from implementing the solution in many scenarios."
"Cloud Pak would be improved with integration with cloud service providers like Cloudera."
"The product is trying to be more maturity in terms of connectors. That, I believe, is an area where Cloud Pak can improve."
"The product must improve its performance."
"The solution's user experience is an area that has room for improvement."
"The tool depends on the control plane, an OpenShift container platform utilized as an orchestration layer...So, we have communicated this issue to IBM and asked if it is feasible to adapt the solution to work on a Kubernetes platform that we support."
"The solution's performance needs improvement."
"Oracle GoldenGate could improve the price."
"The solution's licensing price is very expensive and could be made more competitive."
"Some issues regarding stability need to be resolved."
"The product lacks some features and it's expensive."
"The GoldenGate license is very costly."
"You cannot put everything in Golden Gate for the license and large models."
"The front-end management isn't very good."
IBM Cloud Pak for Data is ranked 17th in Data Integration with 11 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Data is rated 8.0, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Data writes "A scalable data analytics and digital transformation tool that provides useful features and integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". IBM Cloud Pak for Data is most compared with IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Azure Data Factory, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Palantir Foundry and Denodo, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). See our IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.