We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"It is a stable solution."
"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"WSO2 API Manager is easy to use."
"Its open-source features are very good, especially for your production work."
"The user interface is easy to navigate, and the documentation is extensive. It's open-source, so everything is available, and we can create what we need. That's not necessarily a feature, but it's an advantage."
"WSO2 API Manager has a user-friendly model."
"WSO2 is very stable."
"Based on the information I have, the solution's most valuable feature is its capability of implementing custom solutions."
"The solution is open-source."
"This is a flexible and versatile API management solution that has the power to integrate with more than just API."
"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
"The pricing can be improved."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"API Manager is not easy to scale because some of its components lack scalability. It's a difficult point. Especially because companies are so cloud-based these days, microservice scalability is a major thing."
"Lacks some new features and updated functionalities."
"The user interface needs to improve, it is a bit outdated."
"The stability is pretty good, but it could be improved."
"They don't have different URLs for administrators."
"Basically, mTLS is a certificate-based communication protocol that WSO2 API Manager doesn't support."
"The initial setup can be difficult."
"The user interface could be a bit better."
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is ranked 21st in API Management with 4 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 8th in API Management with 33 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is rated 8.6, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration writes "A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes "Reliable with good capabilities and good support". IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is most compared with IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, IBM DataPower Gateway, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Microsoft Azure API Management, whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and Apache APISIX. See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
