IBM Db2 Database vs IBM Netezza Performance Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
11,118 views|7,500 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
2,651 views|1,497 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Db2 Database and IBM Netezza Performance Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Very good for performance and scalability.""The most valuable features of this solution are security and stability.""It's easy to search and extract data from the warehouse using queries.""Some of the most valuable features are the scaling from a small very cheap installation to a very large enterprise installation. In addition, the backups and assistance are good.""The scalability and availability of this solution are the most valuable features.""The solution can scale.""The most valuable features are with the industrial side.""I believe that because the support is good, they jump in and assist us in determining the root cause."

More IBM Db2 Database Pros →

"The benefit is really because of the additional speed that we have and, truth be told, the more updated ETL processes and the revamped scheduler in general.""Distribution concurrency control.""The most valuable feature would be the fact that it has been running for awhile in an appliance format.""The most valuable features of the IBM Netezza Performance Server are the NPS server because of the reduced maintenance and overall good performance.""The performance is most important to me, and it helps our ability to make business decisions quickly.""We are able to execute very complex queries. Over 90 percent of our query executions are one second or less. We do millions of queries everyday.""The underlying hardware that IBM provides with this appliance is made for a specific purpose, to serve performance on a large amount of data, and to do analytics as well. It is faster, when you compare it to any other product.""The data governance prospect... from what I've seen, that is a really powerful tool as well, to help with data lineage and keeping track of that."

More IBM Netezza Performance Server Pros →

Cons
"The pricing could be improved, it's expensive.""The initial set up was complex.""The command line part of this solution could be much better.""When I look at Microsoft SQL Server, SQL Server provides me with better tools for database management.""The solution no longer supports POWER8.""The solution could be more modern and have updated database technology.""The price should be lower.""The capabilities of this solution could improve."

More IBM Db2 Database Cons →

"LIke Teradata, we can’t add a node/SPU to the existing appliance.""The only issue is that it's not expandable.""In terms of features that I would like to see, one is the ability to actually scale out an architecture. Right now, if you buy one, it's fixed. There is no scale-up availability at all.""Concurrency limit needs to be increased somewhat.""Our main problem with it is concurrency. When there are too many users running Netezza at the same time, this is when we have the most complaints.""We are not able to scale. The only way to scale is to get another appliance, but we have a customers who would need us to hydrate the data between the two appliances, and Netezza does not do that.""Oracle Exadata's security features, like TDE encryption, are missing in IBM Netezza Performance Server.""The scalability is not as expected. The capacity in the black box is not enough."

More IBM Netezza Performance Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They are competitive and honest (compared to how peer firms approach licensing conversations). ​"
  • "Compared to Oracle, it is so much cheaper."
  • "Licensing fees are on a yearly basis."
  • "We don't see what the specific price of the DB2 license is because we pay for the backup license as a package."
  • "I think that everyone knows that with IBM the standard price is higher than the others."
  • "Db2 is less expensive than Oracle."
  • "We did not buy it. It came with our hardware without any complimentary maintenance. If I compare Db2 Database with Oracle Database, its price is lower than Oracle Database."
  • "There is a license for this solution and we pay every three years."
  • More IBM Db2 Database Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Netezza is a costly solution. It does serve a specific purpose but it's costlier than what's available in the market, if you go to the cloud."
  • "The pricing is very expensive. It has a lot CPUs with a lot of components in it. It also has built-in redundancy for resiliency reasons."
  • "The solution has a yearly licensing fee, and users have to pay extra for support."
  • More IBM Netezza Performance Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Db2 database scalability and performance capabilities match our database needs. It covers pretty much everything a database administrator or engineer might need.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. Since it's a government contract, the rates are negotiated and agreed upon with the government. So, it's not like the standard market price. It's not super… more »
    Top Answer:Db2 interface could be improved a bit. Comparing it to Oracle, Db2's interfaces could be improved.
    Top Answer:IBM Netezza Performance Server is a cost-effective solution.
    Top Answer:The solution has a yearly licensing fee, and users have to pay extra for support.
    Top Answer:Oracle Exadata's security features, like TDE encryption, are missing in IBM Netezza Performance Server.
    Ranking
    Views
    11,118
    Comparisons
    7,500
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    443
    Rating
    8.0
    10th
    out of 34 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    2,651
    Comparisons
    1,497
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    334
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DB2
    Netezza Performance Server, Netezza
    Learn More
    Overview
    DB2 Enterprise for Linux, UNIX, and Windows is the ideal data server for the most demanding workloads. New XML support is designed to help firms minimize the time and effort it takes to persist and use their XML data reducing development costs and improving business agility.
    IBM Netezza appliances are now part of IBM PureSystems - expert integrated systems with built in expertise, integration by design and a simplified user experience. Part of the PureData family, the Netezza appliance is now known as the PureData System for Analytics. It has the same key design tenets of simplicity, speed, scalability and analytics power that was fundamental to Netezza appliances.
    Sample Customers
    Knorr-Bremse, Mizuho Bank Ltd., Australian Government Department of Defence, SCHWENK Zement, Friedhelm Loh Group, YAZAKI Europe Limited, Ekornes ASA, Baldor Electric, VSN Systemen BV, Lion Brewery (Ceylon) PLC, PLANSEE Group, TE Connectivity, Hansgrohe SE, Openmatics, University of Toronto
    Seattle Childrens Hospital, Carphone Warehouse, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Battelle, Start Today Co. Ltd., Kelley Blue Book, Trident Marketing, Elisa Corporation, Catalina Marketing, iBasis, Barnes & Noble, Qualcomm, MediaMath, Acxiom, iBasis, Foxwoods
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm39%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization52%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Government4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Retailer16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Insurance Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization65%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Insurance Company3%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise56%
    Large Enterprise35%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise69%
    Large Enterprise26%
    Buyer's Guide
    Relational Databases Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Db2 Database is ranked 6th in Relational Databases Tools with 66 reviews while IBM Netezza Performance Server is ranked 10th in Data Warehouse with 33 reviews. IBM Db2 Database is rated 8.2, while IBM Netezza Performance Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Db2 Database writes "Very scalable with high availability and excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Netezza Performance Server writes "A cost-effective data warehousing tool, but security features like TDE encryption are missing". IBM Db2 Database is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, SAP HANA, Teradata and MariaDB, whereas IBM Netezza Performance Server is most compared with Oracle Exadata, Oracle Database, Snowflake, Teradata and Altibase.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.