We performed a comparison between IBM Disaster Recovery Services and Veeam Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software."Disaster Recovery Services is stable."
"The solution works well for very large organizations. It can scale quite well."
"The integration with some storage systems like HP or Nutanix and great support are the most valuable features. You get productivity support. You get a response within one hour, even in the evening or night. The functionality of the whole software is good."
"Veeam Backup has many valuable features and every feature is different. I have created backups for file-level backup, VMware or hypervisor virtual machines, physical machines, and workstations as well. Every time, I learn something new."
"The ability to offload backup snapshots to the SAN helps with reducing the backup durations."
"The solution is easy to use and have good performance."
"Its performance is fine. It supports us very well. It is able to support our policy for RTO, RPO, and other things that we need."
"The most valuable feature is the instant recovery."
"Veeam Backup & Replication is a great alternative to what is out there. Some of the backups just allow an agent backup to the cloud. You can back up a thousand different ways, but this is a great way to keep a customer and a company in compliance in that they've got their data secure onsite and offsite. The data being transferred to the NAS at the customer's location and also the data being sent to the cloud is encrypted in transit and it's also encrypted at rest so that nobody is going to be able to hack into that. No one will have the keys to do that."
"It serves its intended purpose and it works well."
"Disaster Recovery Services could provide better value for money."
"The infrastructure level of IBM's recovery systems could be improved."
"Veeam Backup & Replication should include a cloud solution."
"It would be ideal if they could capture everything and then timestamp and back up everything up to that timestamp."
"When in a domain, the virus can easily attack the Veeam server, something which happened to us."
"We would like to have the ability to perform more things on the web interface. The heavy client is still needed to perform advanced tasks."
"It is efficient but can improve security-wise."
"I have found that the reporting could improve in its structure."
"The interface and cluster environments could be improved in the future as presently they are using agent interface instead of user interface. Also, the backup for the Oracle WAC environment can be improved."
"I would like to see the licensing model improved. They have recently changed the model and have made it more complicated."
More IBM Disaster Recovery Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Disaster Recovery Services is ranked 5th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 2 reviews while Veeam Backup & Replication is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 328 reviews. IBM Disaster Recovery Services is rated 8.0, while Veeam Backup & Replication is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Disaster Recovery Services writes "Quite stable with good scalability for large organizations but the recovery system infrastructure could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup & Replication writes "Beneficial pricing model, user friendly interface, and many free features". IBM Disaster Recovery Services is most compared with Precisely Assure MIMIX, Sungard Disaster Recovery Services and Azure Site Recovery, whereas Veeam Backup & Replication is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, Azure Backup, Rubrik, Zerto and Veritas NetBackup.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.