We performed a comparison between IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."
"It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."
"The most important aspect of the solution is that it rarely gives false positives, especially compared to other products. It provides very clear reports for our IT teams to look at."
"It is a stable solution."
"The solution works well."
"The reports in Rapid7 InsightVM are useful when compared to competitors."
"The most valuable feature for me is the risk calculation based on monthly effects."
"The solution is very user friendly and easy to manage."
"One of the most valuable features is it's graphical dashboard feature. It is quite easy to manage the widgets, and we can customize those according to our queries."
"We are very satisfied with the reports, as they provide us with the information that is required for our management."
"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."
"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."
"I would like to see more integration."
"The integration with other solutions like JIRA could be better. Perhaps there could be some additional updates in the next phase that could integrate with it, so then you can proceed with the VT much easier."
"Some difficulties with the online reporting and lack of integrations."
"InsightVM is getting a little stale and is in danger of falling behind its competitors."
"The product does not have the capability to do dynamic scanning of non-web applications."
"Rapid7 InsightVM, has impressive capabilities, especially when it comes to managing video equipment. However, we've noticed that Rapid7 also offers a cloud solution called CloudSec, and we don't have that. We think it would be better if InsightVM had all the features for both on-premise and cloud management."
"The solution should include a tighter integration with third-party threat modeling and threat intelligence tools."
"The reporting has room for improvement. You cannot customize any report. If I need a specific requirement, I have to create a new report for it."
More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is ranked 40th in Vulnerability Management with 3 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is rated 6.6, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment writes "Worthwhile from the regulatory requirements and analytics perspective, but is expensive and not easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Acunetix and Orca Security, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightIDR.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.