We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere DataStage and Teradata QueryGrid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."The best feature of IBM InfoSphere DataStage for me was that it was very much user-friendly. The solution didn't require that much raw coding because most of its features were drag and drop, plus it had a large number of functionalities."
"The most valuable feature for our data processing needs is IBM InfoSphere DataStage's capability to handle ETL tasks with large record volumes."
"The product is easy to deploy."
"The data lineage report can be filtered for reporting. The reports are user-friendly and take less time to find what you need."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"In IBM DataStage, the Transformer is the most valuable feature for me. It enables me to apply complex transformations, generate the gateway key, and map source tables into the session table."
"The product is a stable and powerful data management solution that can run in parallel mode for enhanced speed."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to transfer information via notes."
"It is a highly robust software solution."
"The response time from support is slow and needs to be improved."
"It would be great if they can include some basic version of data quality checking features."
"The interface needs improvement."
"The initial setup can be complex."
"Working with some of the big data components is good, but I can see improvements are needed."
"The interface needs improvement. It is really too technical. That is the main problem."
"The pricing should be lower."
"It would be useful to provide support for Python, AR, and Java."
"The primary challenge with Teradata lies in its cost structure, encompassing subscription fees, software licenses, and hardware expenses."
IBM InfoSphere DataStage is ranked 7th in Data Integration with 37 reviews while Teradata QueryGrid is ranked 31st in Data Integration with 1 review. IBM InfoSphere DataStage is rated 7.8, while Teradata QueryGrid is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere DataStage writes "User-friendly with a lot of functions for transmission rules, but has slow performance and not suitable for a huge volume of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata QueryGrid writes "Unified and efficient query processing that seamlessly integrates and analyzes data from heterogeneous sources". IBM InfoSphere DataStage is most compared with IBM Cloud Pak for Data, SSIS, Azure Data Factory, Talend Open Studio and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas Teradata QueryGrid is most compared with Teradata Data Mover, Denodo and SSIS.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.