We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus and Sopera Advanced Service Factory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."like the API lead integration, which is more focused, and I also like real-time integration."
"I consider the solution to be one of the most stable in the market."
"IBM Integration Bus's best feature is integration."
"It makes the communication between multiple and heterogeneous applications so easy. We can bring together different messages and applications from different platforms and connect them through IBM Integration Bus."
"IBM Integration Bus has been effective in facilitating our messaging and service-oriented architecture (SOA) or bus architecture. So, we're already utilizing it to transform the data from the source it's sending. It converts the data from the format the source sends it into the format the destination system requires. So we are transforming the messages, which are required by the destination system; that's the one way."
"One of the most valuable features is how seamless and easy to use this solution is. This is a fantastic solution and a very measured product."
"The integration with other tools is excellent. It integrates well with batch issues."
"The most valuable feature is the security."
"I have found the best feature are the administrative controls."
"Storage capacity of the product should be addressed."
"IBM could improve its connectivity."
"We have come across many customer complaints about the excessive time it takes for IBM to provide customer and technical support."
"Current aggregation implementation should be deprecated. MQ independent, as well as an intuitive solution, should be proposed."
"The solution could improve by having built-in implementation and secure monitoring without the need for API Connect."
"Technical support is something that should be better."
"There are a couple of things I want improved, but I think they have already touched upon all those things in the most recent version. I'm not using the most recent version—I use a version older than the most recent—but I'm sure that if I looked into and explored it, I would see more support on the CI/CD and more support for unit testing automation. I've read that they released all these things in the new version of App Connect. Once I explore the new version of this tool, I'll probably have a better idea of suggested improvements."
"One drawback that I have found is that there are issues with using the Java connector."
"This solution is running on the Eclipse platform and this is where all the designing takes place. The Eclipse performance should be improved. The Open Studio tool we have been using for the development is not up to the industry standard and the performance should be improved."
More Sopera Advanced Service Factory Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 63 reviews while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is ranked 18th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sopera Advanced Service Factory writes "Functional administrative controls, highly scalable, and reliable". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and IBM DataPower Gateway, whereas Sopera Advanced Service Factory is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.