We performed a comparison between IBM MQ and TIBCO Rendezvous based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, TIBCO, Aurea and others in Business Activity Monitoring."It is stable, reliable, and scalable."
"Support for JMS 2.0, because we develop solutions compatible with Java EE7."
"A stable and reliable software that offers good integration between different systems."
"Currently, we are not using many advanced features. We are only using point-to-point MQ. I have previously used features like context-based authentication, SSL authentication, and high availability. These are good and pretty cool features. They make your business reliable. For critical business needs, everyone uses only IBM MQ. It is the first choice because of its reliability. There is a one-send-and-one-delivery feature. It also has a no-message-loss feature, and because of that, only IBM MQ is used in banking or financial sectors."
"There is no dependency on the end party service's run status."
"The solution is fast with end data compared to other messaging tools."
"It is useful for exchanging information between applications."
"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."
"TIBCO Rendezvous has a strategy to communicate in the network between the DMO of the product. They provide strategy through secure communication. They use the UDP protocol, but It's not a resilient protocol. They put another protocol to create a type of guarantee. It has a high level of communication between the DMO. This is the best capability the solution has."
"You should be able to increase the message size. It should be dynamic. Each queue has a limitation of 5,000."
"MQ needs instruments for connection with new modern queues like Kafka or RabbitMQ."
"I don’t like legacy view of MQ."
"I would like to see message duplication included."
"At a recent conference, I went to a presentation that had the latest version and it has amazing stuff that's coming out. So, I am excited to use those, specifically surrounding the web console and the fact that it's API integrated."
"I would like less updates from IBM MQ."
"I believe the stability of the product has decreased since we began using it initially."
"More documentation would be good because some features are not deeply implemented."
"TIBCO Rendezvous is currently restricted in a cloud environment and it would be more useful in a hybrid cloud setup. It does not work correctly in a cloud environment alone. This is something they can improve in the future."
Earn 20 points
IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Business Activity Monitoring with 158 reviews while TIBCO Rendezvous is ranked 4th in Business Activity Monitoring. IBM MQ is rated 8.4, while TIBCO Rendezvous is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO Rendezvous writes "Good communication, stable, and responsive support". IBM MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ, Red Hat AMQ and Amazon SQS, whereas TIBCO Rendezvous is most compared with TIBCO FTL and PubSub+ Event Broker.
See our list of best Business Activity Monitoring vendors and best Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.