We performed a comparison between IBM Planning Analytics and QlikView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management."The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized."
"Navigating through the data to make analysis is really quick."
"The most valuable feature is that it is able to slice and dice the data."
"It's a very stable, robust product."
"The product's stability is good."
"Planning Analytics' best features include automatic updates and slicing."
"The ease of use is valuable. The fact that it's plugged into Excel spreadsheets is also valuable. It provides additional functionality where you can slice and dice the information in a way that you can't do with spreadsheets"
"All the different platforms are well integrated."
"The in-memory feature gives us better insight. It's also easy to drill down into the information and select information."
"One of the good thing is that you can integrate different data source technologies. So you can model your environment without having any of our views running."
"Our Qlikview applications help us to get a good idea of our Client Base Performance and assist us in the decision making for Seasonal Specials. On the other hand QlikView helps us to get a grasp on our Suppliers and helps us to negotiate pricing with them."
"QlikView is a scalable solution that multiple users can easily use."
"This is a very cool application with endless options of creativity and visuals."
"We use QlikView for its cost-effectiveness and ease of integration with databases."
"Scripting as per a customer's need, which is a pretty cool feature and not available in other tools."
"It's pretty easy to deploy."
"Planning Analytics could be improved by adding automation features."
"The tool's transport layer could be improved when promoting development between environments."
"It's highly competitive right now, and all the vendors are in a race to put out new versions with additional features. IBM comes out with new versions too often, and it has an impact on quality."
"It would have been better if the solution was not just a tool kit."
"The tool should include features for prediction. It can also improve the scalability."
"The local authentication part is difficult to manage in the product, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The dashboard is very poor and needs a lot of improvement."
"Extracting data is a little slow."
"More/newer visualisation components need to be added."
"The pricing is high."
"If a user wanted to see something not included in the application the new object had to be created by a power user or developer because Qlik view's scripting has somewhat of a learning curve."
"The solution should be mobile-responsive. It should also include drag-and-drop and slice-and-dice features."
"I would like to see more advanced features from Qlik Sense integrated into QlikView to keep it competitive and up-to-date."
"They could improve the update time."
"Enhancing user-friendliness would be highly beneficial."
"There could be a feature to analyze the sales and accounting data of the client."
IBM Planning Analytics is ranked 5th in Business Performance Management with 22 reviews while QlikView is ranked 5th in Reporting with 158 reviews. IBM Planning Analytics is rated 8.6, while QlikView is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Planning Analytics writes "Can easily create dashboards and helps businesses improve forecasting accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QlikView writes "Useful for data visualization and business intelligence". IBM Planning Analytics is most compared with SAP Analytics Cloud, Microsoft Power BI, Anaplan, Jedox and IBM Cognos, whereas QlikView is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, SQL Server and TIBCO Spotfire.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.