We performed a comparison between IBM Rational DOORS and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management."The most valuable feature for me is the ability to enter data into one table, or context, and link it across modules."
"It has the features of: traceability, configuration management, and user access."
"We have different generations of all products. It lets us select and see unique attributes for each release or generation. You can use attributes to define a selection area to see which equipments are for the old versions and which ones are for the new versions. This inbuilt view is what I like in IBM Rational DOORS. So, for a database and a set of requirements, it will select and show unique attributes for a release or a generation."
"The most valuable feature of IBM Rational DOORS is the full requirements development and testing."
"The most valuable feature is the management verification and login."
"It's a very interesting tool. I like that it's simple. You have to create your document, add your templates, and have your headings and definitions, and it's done. You must attribute the discipline and fill out the comment field for requirements. It also provides you with unique IDs for each requirement. I like that it never duplicates IDs."
"The next-generation features are good."
"What I like about DOORS is baselines, it's easy and I use the capability of multiple users. The traceability or links between different levels are very nice. Additionally, it is used by all of our suppliers, which brings us commonality."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."
"I think there is probably room to improve by offering free training."
"The software and GUI is very outdated."
"It would have been ok ten years ago, but we are used to having better tools now."
"The interface needs an area to be able to type your query and actually be able to find them."
"There needs to be quicker access to tech support. When I have a two minute question that takes two minutes to answer, it shouldn't take me 45 minutes and/or a few days of callbacks to get to the right technical support person. It's unnecessary and frustrating for the user."
"They need to provide users with information on what options would be best for their setup."
"I would like to see them improve in agile management the Scrum/Kanban Board to work with overseas team members."
"The interface is not very user-friendly and has not evolved in a long time."
"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."
IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 51 reviews while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is ranked 6th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. IBM Rational DOORS is rated 8.0, while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes " Offers ability to automate tasks and to track changes within documents and compare different versions of requirements but modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity Requirements Connector writes "A requirement management tool that provides a good technical support along with stability". IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with Polarion Requirements, Jira, Jama Connect, Helix ALM and 3SL Cradle, whereas PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is most compared with Jira and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.