We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Logsign Next-Gen SIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution has excellent security analytics."
"The product can scale."
"IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature currently is security behaviors and the pdf files."
"The detection rate is good and the false positive rate is low."
"It also has a graph that shows the traffic history. I can see what happened yesterday or today. If there's an incident, I can check the traffic behavior on QRadar."
"Log correlation is very useful for processing alerts. It serves to follow up alerts in real-time, building an entire workflow."
"There is a single dashboard that gives us a complete overview of what is happening around the globe."
"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."
"The most valuable features of Logsign SIEM are its cloud capabilities, alerting functionality, integration with Elastic Search, and configuration options."
"I'm not sure about the stability just yet. We've observed a few issues and we raised a supporting ticket for it."
"Dashboards and reports could provide better visualization of SIEM activity."
"The user interface is a bit clunky, a bit hard to find what you need."
"We need more features in order to create rules to detect or to meet some requirements for other areas, for example, catching the event from other authentication tools."
"The architecture could be improved. I got stuck for a long time trying to understand the architecture, as it is quite challenging."
"The whole process for support is something that needs to be improved."
"This solution is on-premise and many customers are moving to the cloud base solution."
"I would like to see a better GUI."
"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."
"Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is ranked 39th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 3 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM writes "Easy to use and find the features that you need". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, Logpoint and Sematext Logs. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.