We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Mezmo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a very optimized engine."
"The most valuable features are log monitoring, easy-to-fix issues, and problem-solving."
"Flexible and valuable product that is modular, so you can easily set up a roadmap for your clients."
"The initial setup is not complex or difficult."
"I think the QDI is very good."
"Provided that the report is prebuilt and I can find what I am looking for, the reporting is the most valuable feature in this solution."
"The rule engine is very easy to use — very flexible."
"I like that it's easy to use and the performance is good."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"The advanced planning management (APM) features should be included."
"Needs better visualization options beyond the time series charts and a few other options that they have."
"The Indian tech support is not helpful."
"I would like the rule creation interface to be much more user-friendly in the next release."
"The threat intelligence functionality can be better. In addition, it can have more monitoring capabilities."
"Ideally we would like a mobile version so that any alert that comes in will notify us in a mobile app, or by using SMS integration."
"I have noticed the interface has room for improvement."
"In a future release, the solution could provide malware analysis."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
Earn 20 points
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while Mezmo is ranked 53rd in Log Management. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Mezmo is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mezmo writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Mezmo is most compared with Cribl Stream and Datadog. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Mezmo report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.