IBM SSD vs Samsung SSD comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
49 views|36 comparisons
Samsung Logo
1,139 views|1,040 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Ranking
8th
out of 11 in SSD
Views
49
Comparisons
36
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
4th
out of 11 in SSD
Views
1,139
Comparisons
1,040
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
IBM solid-state storage is affordable with innovative architectures, system and application integration, and management tools that:
  • Improve performance for hard-to-tune, I/O bound applications. No code changes required.
  • Reduce energy use and floor space. Can be filled near 100% without performance degradation.
  • Enable faster access times and IOPS.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Benefit, Employment and Support Services Division, State of Hawaii, INTERSPORT
ChyronHego, Muse Research, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Revention Inc.
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company12%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm9%
University8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise54%

IBM SSD is ranked 8th in SSD while Samsung SSD is ranked 4th in SSD. IBM SSD is rated 0.0, while Samsung SSD is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Samsung SSD writes "The software for transferring data from a hard drive was very intuitive and easy to use. ". IBM SSD is most compared with , whereas Samsung SSD is most compared with Western Digital SSD, Intel SSD, SanDisk SSD and HGST SSD.

See our list of best SSD vendors.

We monitor all SSD reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.