We performed a comparison between IIS and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The solution is the easiest way to publish applications which have been designed by older development tools."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The tool is very easy to use and efficient."
"We use Windows Server only for Eggplant Manager."
"The solution is easy to use and connects with Microsoft."
"The most valuable feature of IIS is the database it provides."
"Windows Server IIS is stable."
"IIS is easy to configure in terms of websites and other solutions."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"Sometimes if you are using IIS in large-scale scenarios, meaning that if you are deploying an application within IIS service and you are expecting a large number of users to use this application, you can sometimes find some problems, meaning that the service can shut down by itself unexpectedly if you don't configure your IIS with the correct configuration that can handle this number of users."
"It lacks a few performance improvement tools."
"The documentation is not very detailed. They need to improve it and add to it. They should ensure there are lots of visuals to help users better understand the solution."
"The solution's black box is not fast."
"The solution is slow and could have better performance."
"The documentation of IIS could be better. They are not easily accessible. I had to use YouTube and other online resources to learn how to use the solution properly."
"If Microsoft IIS could work well with AppOptics or things like PHP, Python, and other custom languages that run on the webserver, it would be ideal. I think there are cases where people need to use Apache instead of IIS when IIS doesn't work well with other web languages."
"The graphical user interface has room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
IIS is ranked 1st in Application Infrastructure with 53 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. IIS is rated 8.0, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and JBoss, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.