We performed a comparison between Infobright DB and MySQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools."It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"It has a community version. When I have to create a new database, I have no problems with licenses."
"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten since it has been running flawlessly."
"It has a lot of features. The RDBMS, consistency, and multi-user features are valuable."
"Setup is easy. MySQL of various flavours has community editions to easily test, deploy, and run."
"The initial setup was pretty straightforward. I would have worked with our IT team in terms of the initial setup."
"The solution has been very easy to scale so far."
"I like the simplistic view of MySQL to build custom queries and things like that as compared to SQL Server, which seems more cluttered. SQL Server has a query analyzer. MySQL pretty much does the same, and performance-wise, it has less overhead for connecting to our ERP system. It seems more responsive and cleaner. With MySQL, you get what you need without any overbloating, for which Microsoft is known. That's why they have so many constant security patches for everything because there is so much stuff, which degrades performance."
"Like other databases, it has a rich set of functions, such as stored procedures and its own procedural language, which is akin to Oracle SQL. It also has trigger and cursor commands you would expect with a good database language."
"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"It is not as powerful as SQL Server. It can be more powerful. It is not scalable and has certain limitations, which is not the case with SQL Server."
"When I run into issues, I really have to research how to fix them."
"Some problems with big table operations, and a struggle to keep the servers responding in peak situations."
"Rather than going in-depth about the technical features, which a technical person can directly tell, I would say that MySQL should be able to adapt to the next framework. The 5G framework means an unstructured framework. So if MySQL becomes smoother and more adaptable, it'll be easier."
"Could use some additional JSON query support in the solution."
"The integration with other systems can be improved as can the integration between other databases."
"The full-text search feature must be improved."
"The licensing cost of the solution is expensive, which MySQL needs to consider improving."
Earn 20 points
Infobright DB is ranked 31st in Relational Databases Tools while MySQL is ranked 4th in Relational Databases Tools with 142 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 7.6, while MySQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MySQL writes "Good beginner base but it should have better support for backups". Infobright DB is most compared with LocalDB, whereas MySQL is most compared with Firebird SQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Teradata and SQL Server.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.