We performed a comparison between Informatica Axon and Information Builders Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."It is a very stable solution. I rate its stability a ten out of ten...It is a scalable solution...Informatica Axon's technical support is good."
"The solution is stable."
"Axon does one interesting thing that I don't think other tools do as well. It lets you rate data and incorporates Informatica's data quality feature into it. There are little indications and graphics that show you how good the data quality is, and you can drill into it to see where potential issues lie."
"The product is stable."
"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to select the data flow and lineage."
"Axon has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has, so they can request access. That's one feature we use extensively. Axon also offers great visibility and intuitive searchability, allowing you to easily search data assets. You can check the lineage and see the work EDC does. EDC handles all the classification, cataloging, and lineage. It's integrated with Axon, and anyone can see that."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon has been the data marketplace."
"Some of Axon's valuable features include creating your business glossaries, importing DQ rules, and creating change management."
"It has an intuitive data quality engine that allows you to modify data, and apply rules to standardize it, and it's an excellent initial stage."
"There are some limitations with Informatica Axon when one tries to connect or integrate it with Jira."
"The main issue probably has nothing to do with end users, but installation can definitely be simplified."
"The stability and the integration of the solution have room for improvement."
"In terms of what could be improved, they need to create a rules repository. Business rules for the attributes that you have, keeping them in that central repository, and governance of them is something which Axon is lacking a bit. The Informatica Data Quality tool actually caters to that, so that's probably why they have not built that up in the Axon, but it is definitely something that can be built in to this product, as well."
"It is complicated to establish the lineage in EDC using PowerCenter mappings."
"I would like to have the solution in one product and technical support needs to be better."
"It would be great if the cloud version could match the full range of capabilities available on-premise."
"I would like to see more API integration to have the capability to build a report using other third party reporting tools to streamline the operation."
"The on-premise features are undeniably robust, but having equally powerful capabilities in the cloud would be a significant enhancement."
Informatica Axon is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 23 reviews while Information Builders Data Governance is ranked 27th in Data Governance with 1 review. Informatica Axon is rated 7.8, while Information Builders Data Governance is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Axon writes "It has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Information Builders Data Governance writes "Balancing robust scalability with cloud features enhancements for streamlined operation". Informatica Axon is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and erwin Data Intelligence by Quest, whereas Information Builders Data Governance is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.