We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Data Integration and TIBCO BusinessWorks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Informatica Cloud Data Integration for our clients are the AI capabilities within Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services."
"The solution provides increased efficiency while still being user-friendly and easy to operate."
"The solution has the best feature for parameterization."
"The most valuable features of the solution are pushdown, optimization, and partitioning, which can be used for frequent data loading, especially when we have a huge data volume in our company."
"It is quite easy to use and flexible."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"It has a more UI-based tool, and the scripting is good."
"Informatica is good for integrating data and cloud applications. We have connectors for integrating cloud applications like Salesforce. You can quickly integrate anything with an exposed API or a REST API. The industry is increasingly shifting to the cloud, so we need more products that can connect to cloud-based applications. The integration is seamless and works in real time. It's also secure because you don't need to expose databases or tables."
"The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues."
"BusinessWorks reduces development time, helping developers to focus on business logic."
"The most valuable feature is the integration."
"One of the most valuable features is data transformation. We have some legacy systems which are in old technology, like SOAP, whereas the new ones are in REST. So we use BusinessWorks to transform data from one format to another, from SOAP to REST."
"Areas for improvement would be the cloud fitness of the product and the ease of migrating to newer versions."
"We use the solution to develop applications."
"Good TIBCO BusinessWorks features are the admin console and the ability to roll back to the previous version."
"XML to JSON transformations, out-of-the-box, helps to build REST services."
"Certain shortcomings in the product's UI make it an area where improvements are required."
"One area where Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve is in providing more accelerators for certain functionalities."
"There are a small number of UI bugs that occur on occasion."
"The biggest challenge I see is the IDE's for the cloud and automization are different."
"A general improvement in icons and the virtual interface would be good."
"It needs to be a little more intuitive but it’s really not bad."
"I would like to see more functionality added so that it is a bit closer to how much you can do with Informatica PowerCenter."
"The main issue preventing Brazilian companies from migrating to Informatica Cloud Data Integration from on-prem is the price."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"A possible improvement could be to give the capability to use different profiles for each AppNode when an application is deployed on an AppSpace."
"The cost has room for improvement."
"Cloud fitness is lacking"
"Scaling with the solution is costly because if we need to scale up, we have to buy more memory. That means more money. Solutions like Camel or Pulsar come with built-in options to scale horizontally, vertically, region-wide or country-wide."
"The Business Studio tool can be improved, which is the tool for designing the processes. Improving the Business Studio tool will make this solution more stable. It has a steep learning curve, and it is pretty tough to learn."
"I would like the solution to be integrated into the cloud."
"This solution's cloud could be improved. I don't know whether it was because we didn't have the internal expertise or if it was the product itself, but since they came later—I think only two or three years into the cloud—after many other iPaaS that had been in the cloud for longer, I feel that maybe they haven't matured in terms of the cloud."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while TIBCO BusinessWorks is ranked 18th in Data Integration with 23 reviews. Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8, while TIBCO BusinessWorks is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO BusinessWorks writes "Reliable integration solution with robust communication capabilities and good scalability". Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas TIBCO BusinessWorks is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Mule Anypoint Platform, Spring Cloud Data Flow, Talend Open Studio and Confluent. See our Informatica Cloud Data Integration vs. TIBCO BusinessWorks report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
