We performed a comparison between Informatica Persistent Data Masking and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking."The most valuable feature is data discovery. This is the most exciting feature for all of the banks."
"Informatica is user-friendly, stable, and scalable. These three aspects are the most valuable for us. If we can make it work well with the CRM, we can continue or try again this year to complete that part of the project. I am confident that this kind of solution is what we need because we have a third-party resource that works in the development."
"Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information."
"The most valuable features are the structure masking and platform masking."
"Informatica provides a comprehensive solution for on-the-fly or real-time data masking."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager triggers critical alerts."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager helps to control servers."
"There are a number of different user interfaces you can choose from."
"The most valuable features are security and speed."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"It can also help with capacity planning, sizing, and maximizing overall performance in a large scale environment."
"The best part is the efficient database performance monitoring and the ability to take actions directly from there."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager is a scalable solution."
"The data discovery isn't that good yet for Salesforce. We have another tool that we use for this. It may be a problem because Salesforce on the cloud."
"Once the data is masked, we won't be able to reverse it back to its original value."
"I have encountered some issues using the substitution, which is one of the techniques of data masking."
"Informatica's support understands the solution, but they lack the experience we need for our use case. That was one thing that we prioritized when we started searching for this kind of solution."
"Informatica should simplify the rules for setting classifications and user access management permissions. It's too complex to define, configure, and make work."
"The product must improve its support team."
"We would like to have a single dashboard for monitoring and controlling all of our products."
"I would like to improve the cost."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
"Reporting and statistical charting is largely still left up the end-user to develop custom solutions."
"We have encountered performance issues when the load is huge."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"There's a lot of documentation to go through as a new user."
Informatica Persistent Data Masking is ranked 10th in Data Masking with 5 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews. Informatica Persistent Data Masking is rated 7.8, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Informatica Persistent Data Masking writes "Enables secure data protection during testing and controlled access to sensitive information". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Informatica Persistent Data Masking is most compared with Delphix, IBM InfoSphere Optim, Protegrity Data Security, IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases.
We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.