We performed a comparison between Avada Software Infrared360 and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring."It's what we use for monitoring our MQ system, so the features that they provide are just really, really good."
"The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."
"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."
"Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"
"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."
"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."
"Some of the most valuable features are its real-time performance view/dashboard, metric history, real-time monitoring and alerts, as well as quick access to Oracle's tuning and diagnostic options."
"It's easy to implement as it's made by Oracle for Oracle."
"Due to the infrastructure's size, the introduction they offer is very, very useful. It helps with an overall understanding of the product."
"I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"The single-pane and single interface in the centralized system is the most valuable feature."
"It is a scalable solution. So far, my company has not faced any issues with the scalability part of the solution."
"I mostly use the top events, and look at how the execution is happening on the database; and monitoring the cluster level rates. I even look at the execution plan."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager for a lot of services like ERP and PLM."
"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."
"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."
"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."
"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."
"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."
"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager's scalability is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Reporting and statistical charting is largely still left up the end-user to develop custom solutions."
"Better mobile access would be useful."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"The deployment is not straightforward."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"The product must improve its support team."
Earn 20 points
Avada Software Infrared360 is ranked 34th in Server Monitoring while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 5th in Server Monitoring with 25 reviews. Avada Software Infrared360 is rated 8.8, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Enable centralized control & administration and cost containment of Oracle products from a single console". Avada Software Infrared360 is most compared with IBM MQ and Dynatrace, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, Quest Foglight for Databases and AppDynamics.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.