• Home
  • Intel DAOS vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage

Intel DAOS vs Red Hat Ceph Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Intel Logo
Intel DAOS
666 views|565 comparisons
Red Hat Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage
Read 22 Red Hat Ceph Storage reviews
14,523 views|12,226 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
File and Object Storage
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Intel DAOS and Red Hat Ceph Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed File and Object Storage Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Intel DAOS?
Anonymous User
Enables increased resilience but lacks RDMA support for inter-OSD communication
The product allows our OpenStack environment to move away from the classic network type of backend storage. It enables increased resilience using... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The other big advantage is that Ceph is free software. Compared to traditional SAN based storage, it is very economical."
  • "There is no cost for software."
  • "Most of time, you can get Ceph with the OpenStack solution in a subscription​​ as a bundle.​"
  • "We never used the paid support."
  • "If you can afford a product like Red Hat Ceph Storage then go for it. If you cannot, then you need to test Ceph and get your hands dirty."
  • "The price of this product isn't high."
  • "The price of Red Hat Ceph Storage is reasonable."
  • "The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure because we own the hardware."

    • More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    How does Red Hat Ceph Storage compare with MiniO?
    Top Answer:Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, easy… more »
    What do you like most about Red Hat Ceph Storage?
    Top Answer:The high availability of the solution is important to us.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Red Hat Ceph Storage?
    Top Answer:Some documentation is very hard to find. The documentation must be quickly available.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    Ranking
    19th
    out of 51 in File and Object Storage
    Views
    666
    Comparisons
    565
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    3rd
    out of 51 in File and Object Storage
    Views
    14,523
    Comparisons
    12,226
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Intel Distributed Asynchronous Object Storage
    Ceph
    Learn More
    Intel
    Red Hat
    Overview

    Intel has been building an entirely open source software ecosystem for data-centric computing, fully optimized for Intel® architecture and non-volatile memory (NVM) technologies, including Intel® Optane™ DC persistent memory and Intel® Optane™ DC SSDs. Distributed Asynchronous Object Storage (DAOS) is the foundation of the Intel exascale storage stack. DAOS is an open source software-defined scale-out object store that provides high bandwidth, low latency, and high I/O operations per second (IOPS) storage containers to HPC applications. It enables next-generation data-centric workflows that combine simulation, data analytics, and AI.

    Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Dell, DreamHost
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    University9%
    Educational Organization9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    File and Object Storage
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Intel DAOS is ranked 19th in File and Object Storage while Red Hat Ceph Storage is ranked 3rd in File and Object Storage with 22 reviews. Intel DAOS is rated 0.0, while Red Hat Ceph Storage is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Ceph Storage writes "Provides block storage and object storage from the same storage cluster". Intel DAOS is most compared with VAST Data, MinIO and Dell PowerScale (Isilon), whereas Red Hat Ceph Storage is most compared with MinIO, VMware vSAN, Portworx Enterprise, Pure Storage FlashBlade and Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct.

    See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

    We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.