We performed a comparison between Jakarta EE and Spring MVC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process."
"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly."
"The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."
"Spring gives you the opportunity to develop architecture in the simplest way possible. It comes with everything you would want in terms of security. If you want to access the database, you have the ability to do that."
"Spring MVC is fast and reliable."
"We appreciate that this product is really easy to integrate with third-party UI services."
"We have found Spring is easy to use and learn."
"The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities."
"The interface is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"The solution is open-source and free to use."
"Dependency Injection is one of the major features which makes our life easier using Spring. It is well documented and has active communities, which provide us enormous help."
"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."
"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."
"All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."
"Spring MVC could improve the integration with DevOps and other applications."
"The documentation for Spring MVC could improve."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"Spring IDE needs some work and improvement. We have faced many issues when adding third-party Eclipse plugins."
"The solution could be simplified quite a bit. It's unnecessarily complicated in some areas."
"Adding more modules takes about 10 to 15 minutes each. It would be nice if they could reduce that part. The deployment time is a little high."
"I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings."
"We would like the deployment of this solution to be easier as, at present, it is quite complicated."
Jakarta EE is ranked 4th in Java Frameworks with 3 reviews while Spring MVC is ranked 3rd in Java Frameworks with 16 reviews. Jakarta EE is rated 7.4, while Spring MVC is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Jakarta EE writes "A robust enterprise Java capabilities with complex configuration involved, making it a powerful choice for scalable applications while requiring a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring MVC writes "Straightforward setup, highly stable, and useful online support". Jakarta EE is most compared with Spring Boot, Amazon Corretto, Eclipse MicroProfile, Vert.x and Apache Spark, whereas Spring MVC is most compared with Spring Boot, Open Liberty, Apache Spark, Oracle Application Development Framework and Vert.x. See our Jakarta EE vs. Spring MVC report.
See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.
We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
