We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Oracle E-Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Activity Based Costing Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"A stable and solid product."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"The most valuable features of Oracle E-Business Suite are all the 15 to 20 modules. We use them on a day-to-day basis."
"It makes financial operations easier to perform."
"This is a world-class application that includes a lot of business processes from other ERPs that Oracle has acquired."
"Really scalable business application suite with good technical support and straightforward patching."
"It can be an essential solution for those who can not just push to the cloud because they have critical data restrictions."
"The solution is good for small businesses."
"Financial reconciliation and reporting."
"It provides a well-centered database that is feature rich."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."
"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"Oracle has improved a lot because Oracle E-Business Suite is quite outdated. Oracle built the Oracle Fusion platform and it has many improved processes. We registered a few enhancements requests, but it's a very long bureaucratic process with Oracle. It doesn't make any sense to communicate with Oracle about what changes should be made to the system."
"The implementation took a long time but it was for many reasons. However, Oracle made sure that the solution and systems were up and running."
"The way things are going, Oracle is not putting much effort into their master data management. They need to look into machine data and then the integrated data domain."
"The UI interface is not great."
"Oracle E-Business Suite uses an old technology (Forms), which is Java-based."
"The user interface could be better. It's not good because they made their interface all in one, and my customers don't want to use it. I have to customize the interface and personalize it to hide some fields on the screen. It has lots of information on the screen, and the user can't easily navigate it. It's very difficult to use. I think that Oracle should have something like best practices. They need to provide some patches to simplify the interface based on the industry niche. Because now we see everything on the same screen, but the users don't need all that information. It's complicated to use for end-users, and we have to spend more time training them. In the next release, I think they should implement most of the features in the mobile app. It should be better. Oracle didn't update their mobile application for a very long time. Connecting the mobile application is complicated."
"Areas for improvement would be that sometimes it's a bit rigid with customization and doesn't always facilitate region-specific requirements."
"The operations could be better, specifically for manufacturing processes."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 3rd in Activity Based Costing Software with 55 reviews while Oracle E-Business Suite is ranked 1st in Activity Based Costing Software with 141 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while Oracle E-Business Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle E-Business Suite writes "Offers valuable finance tools". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA and PeopleSoft, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP S/4HANA, SAP ERP, NetSuite ERP and Microsoft Dynamics AX. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Oracle E-Business Suite report.
See our list of best Activity Based Costing Software vendors and best ERP vendors.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.