JFrog Container Registry vs Red Hat Quay comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
JFrog Logo
5,255 views|4,977 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
2,212 views|1,940 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JFrog Container Registry and Red Hat Quay based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry.
To learn more, read our detailed Container Registry Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.""We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."

More JFrog Container Registry Pros →

"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."

More Red Hat Quay Pros →

Cons
"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline.""In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."

More JFrog Container Registry Cons →

"It could be more integrated with other platforms."

More Red Hat Quay Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."
  • More JFrog Container Registry Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
    Top Answer:The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version because we have a data consumption of 6GB in our organization. We considered the Enterprise plan as well, which is… more »
    Top Answer:In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started. However, once you gain some experience, working with JFrog becomes… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 13 in Container Registry
    Views
    5,255
    Comparisons
    4,977
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    8.0
    6th
    out of 13 in Container Registry
    Views
    2,212
    Comparisons
    1,940
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

    Red Hat Quay is a private container registry that stores, builds, and deploys container images. It analyzes your images for security vulnerabilities, identifying potential issues that can help you mitigate security risks.

    Sample Customers
    Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard
    The Asiakastieto Group, Akbank, TTTECH
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Container Registry
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry. Updated: April 2024.
    770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    JFrog Container Registry is ranked 4th in Container Registry with 2 reviews while Red Hat Quay is ranked 6th in Container Registry. JFrog Container Registry is rated 8.0, while Red Hat Quay is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JFrog Container Registry writes "Self-hosted and works well in hybrid SaaS environments and automation is fast without any breakdowns". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Quay writes "A stable repository that is easy to use and easy to install". JFrog Container Registry is most compared with Harbor, Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry and VMware Harbor Registry, whereas Red Hat Quay is most compared with Harbor, Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry and VMware Harbor Registry.

    See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

    We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.