We performed a comparison between Juniper vSRX and Sophos Virtualization Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Trend Micro, Sophos, Juniper and others in Virtualization Security."The solution has good features."
"The architecture of the OS in Juniper is very good. It's flexibility, scalability, and the technicality is also good."
"The product's scalability is good, and my company has 150 users."
"It's basic functionality is probably the most valuable feature."
"It's a very powerful solution and the firewalls offer high performance"
"We like the solution’s protocol and its dashboard system."
"The command feature is valuable."
"The tool's most valuable features are routing features and service quality."
"When it comes to their firewall, it notified me about a possible infection."
"I like Sophos Virtualization Security's built-in antivirus and malware protection. The firewalls are pretty stable. It's just a matter of updating the virus signatures, and they're pretty good about providing those updates regularly."
"The SVM deployment has very good performance."
"The most valuable features of the solution are VM security, VLP, and threat protection."
"Using this solution allows us to set up rule-based access control."
"The GUI interface needs improvement."
"I would like to see an activity sensor for malicious content or sensor for viruses and malware."
"The security feature must be improved."
"They could provide support for cloud deployments."
"The GUI really needs a lot of work, and it has got worse with successive version updates."
"It is pretty complex to manage and could be easier."
"I've talked to people that say Juniper now, as a device, can be a solution for a data center, but in the past, I have not seen this as being possible."
"The solution's GUI needs improvement."
"Sophos Virtualization Security requires more usage. For example, if you have a virtual service line of 100 nodes, you are unable to deploy them from the console to a particular environment."
"I wish Sophos could offer the solution at a lower price, but I doubt they will."
"The solution would be improved if all of the advanced features were included in the SVM."
"We are unable to reliably specify bandwidth limits for particular clients, which is something that needs to be improved."
"I would like to see some new features for improving the security part of the solution."
More Sophos Virtualization Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Juniper vSRX is ranked 3rd in Virtualization Security with 30 reviews while Sophos Virtualization Security is ranked 2nd in Virtualization Security with 5 reviews. Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8, while Sophos Virtualization Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Virtualization Security writes "Stable security and VPN solutions". Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and Zscaler Cloud Firewall, whereas Sophos Virtualization Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security.
See our list of best Virtualization Security vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
