SingleStore vs kdb+ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Kx Systems Logo
439 views|303 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SingleStore Logo
333 views|242 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between kdb+ and SingleStore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution returns data quickly, and data retrieval is fast in kdb+."

More kdb+ Pros →

"The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.""It's a distributed relational database, so it does not have a single server, it has multiple servers. Its architecture itself is fast because it has multiple nodes to distribute the workload and process large amounts of data.""The product can automatically reinstall and reconfigure in case of a shutdown.""The most valuable feature is the ability to create pipelines, streamline and extract data from the pipelines.""The product's initial setup phase was pretty straightforward, with no complex processes.""The ability to store data in memory is a standout feature, enhanced by robust failover mechanisms.""MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short."

More SingleStore Pros →

Cons
"The solution should have a more user-friendly user interface."

More kdb+ Cons →

"Poor key distribution can significantly impact performance, requiring a backward approach in design rather than adding tables incrementally.""There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great.""Having the ability to migrate servers using a single command would be extremely beneficial.""It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks.""We don't get good discounts in Pakistan.""The product can be developed further to provide more appropriate output to users as it is one of the areas where there are shortcomings.""For new customers, it's very tough to start. Their documentation isn't organized, and there's no online training available. SingleStore is working on it, but that's a major drawback."

More SingleStore Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."
  • "SingleStore is a bit expensive."
  • "The product's licensing is not expensive. It is comparable."
  • "Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure."
  • "The price of the product is okay compared to the other available solutions in the market. SingleStore is a reasonably priced product, considering the functions it offers."
  • "They have two main options: cloud installation and bare-metal installation, each with different pricing models."
  • More SingleStore Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution returns data quickly, and data retrieval is fast in kdb+.
    Top Answer:The solution should have a more user-friendly user interface.
    Top Answer:I work for a fintech company where we create several strategies generally built on finance data, which are like one-time series data. We deal with huge bulk data on a daily basis, and we use kdb+ for… more »
    Top Answer:The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.
    Top Answer:Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure. While building an on-premise cluster incurs an initial cost for servers with ample RAM… more »
    Top Answer:There's a noteworthy consideration when it comes to collecting massive amounts of data. It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    439
    Comparisons
    303
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    235
    Rating
    9.0
    6th
    Views
    333
    Comparisons
    242
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    607
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Oracle Database In-Memory logo
    Compared 35% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 27% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Teradata logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    CockroachDB logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Learn More
    Kx Systems
    Video Not Available
    SingleStore
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Kx is the world leader in high-performance, in-memory computing, streaming analytics and operational intelligence. The company’s focus is on delivering the best possible performance and flexibility for high-volume, data-intensive analytics and applications. Kx software includes the time-series database kdb+ with a built-in programming language called q, and a robust suite of visualization tools built on top of the database platform providing business intelligence for all users.

    The SingleStore platform combines transactional, analytical, and vector data workloads in a real-time, unified, distributed SQL database that is MySQL and MongoDB wire protocol-compatible. SingleStore also combines the capabilities of traditional databases with the scalability of the cloud, making it suitable for a range of data-driven applications.

    SingleStore provides a unified platform that supports both transactional and analytical workloads, enabling real-time data processing and analysis. It is optimized for speed, offering low-latency data access and high throughput. The platform's distributed architecture allows it to scale horizontally, handling large volumes of data across multiple nodes. Additionally, it supports SQL, making it accessible for users familiar with standard query languages.

    Key features of SingleStore include real-time data ingestion, which allows for the immediate processing of incoming data, and a fully distributed SQL execution engine that enhances performance. The platform also offers in-memory rowstore and disk-based columnstore, providing flexibility in data storage and retrieval methods. Furthermore, SingleStore ensures high availability and disaster recovery with its multi-cloud, multi-region deployment options.

    When evaluating SingleStore, you should consider its ability to reduce query response times significantly, improve operational efficiencies with real-time analytics, and lower infrastructure costs through efficient resource utilization. Additionally, the platform's support for mixed workloads enables businesses to streamline their data operations, reducing the need for multiple specialized databases.

    SingleStore is implemented across various industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it helps with real-time risk analysis and fraud detection. In healthcare, it supports advanced analytics for patient data management. Retailers use SingleStore to optimize supply chain operations and personalize customer experiences through real-time data insights.

    Pricing for SingleStore is based on a subscription model, with costs determined by the resources allocated and the level of support required. It offers flexible licensing options to accommodate different business needs. SingleStore's customer support is known for its responsiveness and expertise, providing users with the necessary assistance to maximize the platform's potential.

    In summary, SingleStore offers a versatile and efficient cloud database solution suitable for handling diverse data workloads with high performance and scalability.

    Sample Customers
    UniCredit, AIRBUS
    6Sense, Adobe, Akamai, CARFAX, Cigna, Cisco, Comcast, DBS Bank, Dell, GE, Goldman Sachs, Heap, Hulu, IMAX, Kakao, Kroger, LiveRamp, Lumana, NBC, Outreach, Palo Alto Networks, Siemens, SiriusXM, SK Telecom, SKAI, Sony, STC, TATA, and ZoomInfo.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm40%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Relational Databases Tools
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    kdb+ is ranked 19th in Relational Databases Tools with 1 review while SingleStore is ranked 6th in Database as a Service with 7 reviews. kdb+ is rated 9.0, while SingleStore is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of kdb+ writes "An easy-to-deploy solution that can be used for data ingestion and usage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SingleStore writes "A reasonably priced product that offers good speed and seamless support". kdb+ is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory, MariaDB and SQL Server, whereas SingleStore is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Teradata and CockroachDB.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.