Kiuwan vs SonarCloud comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Kiuwan Logo
1,874 views|1,513 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Sonar Logo
10,251 views|7,640 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kiuwan and SonarCloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Testing (AST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan vs. SonarCloud Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company.""The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating.""The solution has a continuous integration process.""I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance.""I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution.""The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me.""Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices.""I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

More Kiuwan Pros →

"For what it is meant to do, it works pretty well.""Its dashboard provides a unified view of various code quality metrics, including code duplication, unit test coverage, and security hotspots.""Recently, they introduced support for mono reports and microservices, which is a noteworthy development as it provides a more detailed view of each service.""The solution can be installed locally.""The reports from SonarCloud are very good.""SonarCloud is overall a good tool for identifying code smells, bugs, and code duplication, but we've found that using Android Lint is more effective for our needs.""I'm not implementing the solutions. However, I've talked to the people who deploy the tools, and they are happy with how easy setting up SonarCloud is.""The solution provides continuous code analysis which has improved the quality of our code. It can raise alarms on vulnerabilities with immediate reports on the dashboard. Few things are false positives and we can customize the rules."

More SonarCloud Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see additional languages supported.""It could improve its scalability abilities.""DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on.""It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality.""I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution.""The QA developer and security could be improved.""I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs.""The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

More Kiuwan Cons →

"SonarCloud can improve the false positives. Sometimes the gates sometimes act a little weird. We then need to manually go and mark the false positive.""The reports could improve by providing more information. We are not able to use the reports in our operation until they are improved. Additionally, if the vendor provided more customization capabilities it would be a benefit.""SonarCloud's UI needs enhancement.""We had some issues with the scanner.""The documentation needs improvement on optimizing build time for seamless CI/CD integration with our Android apps.""I've been told by the developers that the solution is too limited. It's not testing enough within the containers.""The solution needs to improve its customization and flexibility.""There's room for improvement in the configuration process, particularly during the initial setup phase."

More SonarCloud Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Check with your account manager."
  • "Nothing special. It's a very fair model."
  • "I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."
  • "This solution is cheaper than other tools."
  • "It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."
  • "Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."
  • "The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."
  • More Kiuwan Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of SonarCloud could be less expensive. We are using the community version and the price should be more reasonable."
  • "The price of SonarCloud is not expensive, it goes by the lines of code. 1 million lines per code are approximately 4,000 USD per year. If you need 2 million lines of code you would double the annual cost."
  • "I am using the free version of the solution."
  • "I rate the pricing a five out of ten."
  • "While not extremely cheap, it aligns well with market standards and offers good value."
  • "The current pricing is quite cheap."
  • More SonarCloud Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.
    Top Answer:I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business… more »
    Top Answer:Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran… more »
    Top Answer:Recently, they introduced support for mono reports and microservices, which is a noteworthy development as it provides a more detailed view of each service.
    Top Answer:I would rate the price an eight out of ten because it's reasonable. While not extremely cheap, it aligns well with market standards and offers good value. It's an all-inclusive package where you pay a… more »
    Top Answer:There's room for improvement in the configuration process, particularly during the initial setup phase. Setting up features like mono reports can be challenging, and the existing documentation could… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,874
    Comparisons
    1,513
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    607
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    10,251
    Comparisons
    7,640
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    523
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 51% of the time.
    Checkmarx One logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Snyk logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    OWASP Zap logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 77% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Checkmarx One logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Learn More
    Interactive Demo
    Kiuwan
    Demo Not Available
    Overview

    Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

    We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

    SonarCloud is a cloud-based alternative of the SonarQube platform, offering continuous code quality and security analysis as a service. SonarCloud integrates seamlessly with popular version control and CI/CD platforms such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps. It provides static code analysis to identify and help remediate issues such as bugs and security vulnerabilities. SonarCloud enables developers to receive immediate feedback on their code within their development environment, facilitating the maintenance of high-quality code standards, and promoting a culture of continuous improvement in software development projects. It helps produce software that is secure, reliable, and maintainable. SonarCloud is free for open-source projects and is offered as a paid subscription for private projects, priced per lines of code.

    Sample Customers
    DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Legal Firm33%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Non Tech Company11%
    Wireless Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Healthcare Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Kiuwan vs. SonarCloud
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan vs. SonarCloud and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kiuwan is ranked 16th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 23 reviews while SonarCloud is ranked 10th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 10 reviews. Kiuwan is rated 8.6, while SonarCloud is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Kiuwan writes "Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarCloud writes "Beneficial vulnerability discovery, simple to maintain, and proactive support". Kiuwan is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Snyk, Veracode and OWASP Zap, whereas SonarCloud is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Checkmarx One, GitLab and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional. See our Kiuwan vs. SonarCloud report.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.