We performed a comparison between LocalDB and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is fast."
"The initial setup is very straightforward. The guidelines are very easy to follow. Maintenance is very easy and requires very little manpower."
"The initial setup was simple."
"The most valuable feature of LocalDBis the connection between the application and DB."
"The key advantages are Performance when processing Terabytes of data and scalability."
"When it comes to integration, tools like Informatica seamlessly connect with Teradata. We ensure the Teradata database is configured correctly in Informatica, including the proper hostname and properties for the load process. We didn't find any major complexity or issues with integration."
"Teradata can be easily used in ETL mode transformations, so there is no need for expensive and inconvenient ETL tools"
"The most valuable features are the large volume of data and the structuring of the data to optimize it and get very optimal data warehouse solutions for customers."
"I found all parts --loading, transformation, processing & querying work in parallel, and end-to-end-- to be valuable."
"Building a data warehouse with Teradata has definitely helped a lot of our downstream applications to more easily access information."
"It's very mature from a technology perspective."
"It has given our business the ability to gain insights into the data and create data labs for analysis and PoCs."
"The initial setup is complex and requires a skilled person."
"The internal connection features of LocalDB could improve."
"The ALM features can be improved, but the database by itself is reliable."
"The solution needs to create a management tool. Right now, the solution has tools for creating a local installation, but it's too simplistic. We need something that's a bit more complex so that we can extend the tools with our scripts."
"Teradata needs to expand the kind of training that's available to customers. Teradata only offers training directly and doesn't delegate to any third-party companies. As a result, it's harder to find people trained on Teradata in our market relative to Oracle."
"Teradata's UI could be more user-friendly."
"The increasing volumes of data demand more and more performance."
"I think the UI is not there yet. It could be improved by being more user-friendly."
"I'm not sure about the unstructured data management capabilities. It could be improved."
"The SQL Assistant is very basic. This tool can be improved for usability."
"Sometimes the large injestion takes days to load data, and some of our stored procedures take two to three days."
"It would help to make scaling easier with a reduced cost. "
LocalDB is ranked 15th in Relational Databases Tools with 5 reviews while Teradata is ranked 7th in Relational Databases Tools with 54 reviews. LocalDB is rated 9.0, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of LocalDB writes "Good for the development process, generally stable, and easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Offers seamless integration capabilities and performance optimization features, including extensive indexing and advanced tuning capabilities". LocalDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle Database In-Memory, Oracle Database and Infobright DB, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, MySQL and BigQuery. See our LocalDB vs. Teradata report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.