We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Endpoint Central and VMware Workspace ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It supports end-users who tend to lock their devices quite frequently. Its conditional access policy helps us keep the users logged into their devices."
"Intune's most valuable features are the device, compliance, and configuration policies."
"One of the main features of the solution is it allows the management of many devices in different ways."
"It is a very stable and scalable cloud-only solution."
"Maturity makes it a stable product."
"With on-premises Active Directory, the main challenge was that we had no control when a user was working from home. We didn't know what exactly a user was doing and whether the AV was up to date or not. Intune provides better control of their machines."
"It's easy to manage and easy to configure."
"The conditional access policies that we set up are very useful."
"What I like best about this product is that I can log on to every PC, very easily, and chat with the user via the chat feature."
"It's a complete product that allows you to remote troubleshoot, has an inventory of systems."
"Identification of gaps and filling the gaps with updates are most valuable. We are able to identify known updates or missing updates and then update."
"In terms of technical capability, it is doing very well. It is doing better than other industry products. It is at a place where we can compare it with Microsoft products. Its scalability is also good."
"Everything is easily centralized and managed under this one product."
"One of the benefits of Desktop Central is it made the provisioning process simpler because now we have a provisioning package. We have around 1,500 laptops at the moment and all these PCs were provisioned by a provisioning package. In the provisioning package, we have integrated every aspect of renaming, deploying applications, patching, etc., so we simply execute the provisioning package and as soon as it's executed, it will install the management agent. Once the agent is installed, it will take care of all the tasks, so we don't have to sit in front of the computer to prepare the machine. This really helps us to provision the PC quickly with our agent."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The solution's most valuable features are its patch management capabilities, especially for third-party applications, along with quick and easy configuration and deployment processes."
"The product enables us to access our internal applications from anywhere in the world."
"The remote management and location capabilities are good."
"A very easy to use solution."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The feature with the highest rating for me is its employee management. I can also praise how versatile it is in terms of operating systems. It has good support for multiple operating systems and can easily manage them all. Not just that, but it can also support any kind of tool that can be run on all these operating systems."
"If an outside person tries to track or hack information, it is not possible without us being notified."
"The feature that we find most valuable is the corporate email pushing."
"It's a tool that can be managed in various departments."
"What would make this product better is adding more security policies and features in the next upgrade."
"There could be more wizard-driven policy development or creation. Some of the policies can get quite complex. If they have a wizard that assists the administrators in creating the policy, that will be a great job."
"There can be some added features, such as an improved dashboard. Any new feature that could be a benefit to our customers would be good."
"I'd suggest adding more features for macOS in Intune. There should be more functionality for managing macOS. There should be a better capability for pushing things down on macOS. Currently, Intune is not capable of managing macOS at the same level as Windows."
"The add-ons must be integrated into the solution."
"Microsoft needs to enhance device-level security, as sometimes when using Microsoft Intune, the device's operating system becomes stuck and requires a full uninstall to remove the Intune bug."
"Microsoft Intune's support for Mac devices is lacking and could be improved."
"The solution could improve its flexibility."
"Improvement should be done as per customer requirements."
"I would like to see them come out with a SaaS version of the product in the future."
"The product's remote access manager needs improvement."
"The support could be faster."
"The reports provided by the product are an area of concern where improvements are required. The visibility provided by the reports is not very attractive."
"The OS deployment could be better."
"The solution is expensive."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central should keep up with some of the features that other major vendors are providing, such as Microsoft."
"The application itself individuals are getting annoyed with it. They are looking to integrate with ABB applications regardless of whether it is Android or iOS based. We are wanting to shift from this application because of the integration issues we are facing."
"When it comes to deployment and maintaining security, there should be an integrated console where you have a singular view of all of the products from the same OEM."
"I tried to use the tool on an encrypted disk, but it was inconvenient."
"The only downside to the solution is that the dashboard is very confusing."
"The Content Locker cannot inherit permissions for the Windows Public Folder. If they could integrate with Microsoft on this point, it would be the perfect functionality."
"When we had some issues, the support did not respond quickly, and they did not provide a solution."
"There is room for improvement in customer service and support."
"From an improvement perspective, there is a need for discounts to be offered by the solution since it is something that any organization can expect from the product."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 4th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 59 reviews while VMware Workspace ONE is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 82 reviews. ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2, while VMware Workspace ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workspace ONE writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and offers single sign-on". ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, SOTI MobiControl and BigFix, whereas VMware Workspace ONE is most compared with VMware Horizon, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, Citrix Workspace and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM). See our ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs. VMware Workspace ONE report.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors and best UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
