ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Microsoft Windows Server Update Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and Microsoft Windows Server Update Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup was easy.""The most valuable features are patch management and mobile device management.""ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is lightweight and has a remote push feature that helps me manage several main sites and subsites.""The fetch repository is a good feature.""Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The most valuable feature of this solution is centralized management.""It is a highly stable solution.""The ability to deploy patches seamlessly is the solution's most valuable aspect. It allows us to not only deploy patches but to monitor the deployment of those patches."

More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Pros →

"The solution performs well.""Provides the ability to create multiple downstream servers.""We can track the updates of the PC and servers.""The most valuable feature is its ability to identify which updates are needed on a particular machine.""The product provides a valuable Single Sign-On (SSO) integration feature within our IES environment, particularly with the IT directory and server systems.""The interface is easy to use.""The platform provides good value in terms of time and effort by eliminating the need for manual patch management.""The reporting capabilities that help maintain compliance and security are good."

More Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Pros →

Cons
"The user interface of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to be made more user-friendly, simplified, and less complicated.""The agent can be a bit more intelligent.""I find the user interface a little bit intimidating and not very appealing.""They should add better features for managing hardware.""The cloud version should have option to add all the endpoints using the agent. Not only for Windows, but also the Linux version. There are some versions which are not compatible with SaaS Manager. So some customers do not want to use the latest version of Linux latest version of CentOS. Actually, CentOS is not available. But some are using and patch manager is compatible for some versions only, not older older versions. So there are some pros and cons that are referred to patch management.""There are limitations to this solution when we are working with iOS, Apple laptops or desktops such as the Mac and iMac.""The solution's UI is an area that requires improvement.""ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to improve speed."

More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Cons →

"Having the ability to group updates by the operating systems would be very helpful.""The security could be improved.""The product must improve its support.""User interface is outdated and not user-friendly.""They could reduce the platform's prices.""In the next release, I would like to see additional tools added to fix the engine issues on the client's side.""The approval process must be improved.""The only complex part was the solution’s tricky setup phase."

More Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and the charge for support is extra."
  • "The price of this product is reasonable."
  • "The solution cost is around $5,000 per year."
  • "The pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is on the moderate side."
  • "Its price needs improvement."
  • "I rate the product price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
  • "I rate the price of the product a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
  • "ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is a little bit cheaper."
  • More ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Because it is not open-source, it has to compete with open-source solutions. Relatively it is expensive to open-source."
  • "The WSUS cost is included in Microsoft Windows, and there are no licensing fees."
  • "The integration is included in the Windows Server system, and there are no additional fees."
  • "This product comes included with Windows and can be used free of charge."
  • "The licensing of WSUS is free of charge because it comes with the Windows Server operating system, included as a feature of the operating system itself. It's simply a role that you enable within Windows Server."
  • "It doesn't need a license. It's offered for free with Microsoft."
  • "Microsoft's operating model determines the solution's pricing, and we use it based on our enterprise agreement, which incurs an annual cost."
  • "The solution is expensive, and the licensing costs are yearly."
  • More Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The cloud version should have the option to add all the endpoints using the agent. Not only for Windows but also the Linux version. There are some versions that are not compatible with SaaS Manager… more »
    Top Answer:The policies must be made easier. The tool must allow users to update the policies. Currently, we can only create policies and update a few things in them. The product must provide more functions. The… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 50 in Patch Management
    Views
    2,479
    Comparisons
    2,078
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    363
    Rating
    8.8
    3rd
    out of 50 in Patch Management
    Views
    4,520
    Comparisons
    3,697
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    420
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Windows Server Update Services, Microsoft WSUS, WSUS, Microsoft Software Update Services, Software Update Services, Microsoft SUS, SUS, MS Windows Server Update Services
    Learn More
    Overview

    Patch Manager Plus is a simple patch management tool that makes it easy to keep your network patched and secure. It is an endpoint patch management software that provides enterprises a single interface for automating all patch management tasks - from detecting missing patches to deploying patches - for Windows, Mac, Linux and 250+ third-party applications. Whether you have one computer or hundred, they can all be patched at the same time from a single point of console.

    Microsoft Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) is a patch management tool that simplifies the administrator’s task of deploying the latest Microsoft updates. Administrators use WSUS to manage the distribution of updates released through Microsoft Update to computers in their network.

    WSUS has features you can use to manage and distribute updates from a management console. The WSUS server can also be a source of updates to other servers within the organization, acting as an upstream server.

    Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Use Cases

    The four main use cases that WSUS adds value to businesses are:

    • Centralizes update management.
    • Automates update management.
    • Performs general patch management to ensure compliance and protect against vulnerabilities.
    • Downloads all endpoint updates from data centers to a central location and then distribute them across the organization’s network.

    Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Features

    This built-in server includes the following features:

    • Includes Windows PowerShell cmdlets.
    • Features client and server separation, which means you can deliver versions of the Windows Update Agent (WUA) separately from WSUS.
    • Automatic download of updates.
    • Deploy a targeted download of updates to a specific group of computers.
    • Multiple language support.
    • Advanced reporting capabilities.
    • Centralized management of network resources.

    Requirements

    In order to be able to use WSUS to manage and deploy updates, it is important to use a supported WSUS version, such as:

    • WSUS 10.0.14393
    • WSUS 10.0.17763
    • WSUS 6.2 and 6.3 with installed KB 3095113 and KB 3159706

    Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Benefits

    • Stable.
    • Ensures servers are always patched and prevents vulnerabilities.
    • Works great for internal updating.
    • Enforces automated updates and patching for applications.
    • Because the solution is used in the cloud, clients are always using the latest version.
    • Highly scalable and configurable regardless of the organization’s layout.

    Different Types of WSUS Deployments

    • Simple WSUS deployment: A server inside the corporate firewall serves clients via a private intranet. The WSUS server downloads updates by connecting to Microsoft Update. Using this model, you can configure multiple WSUS servers with a parent WSUS server.

    • Computer groups: You can use computer groups to deliver updates to specific computers. There are two basic computer groups: All Computers or Unassigned Computers. When a client first contacts the WSUS server, it is added to both. You can then create a group from the Unassigned Computers group to the new group.

    • WSUS server hierarchies: The flexibility of WSUS enables the creation of complex hierarchies of servers. To do this, you need only a single WSUS server connected to Microsoft Update. This will serve as an “upstream server,” and the connected servers as “downstream servers.”

      • You can link WSUS servers in two modes: autonomous or replica. In the autonomous mode, the upstream server shares the updates with the downstream servers but doesn’t update status or group information.

      • The upstream server shares updates, status, and group information in replica mode. You cannot administer replica servers apart from the upstream WSUS server.
    Sample Customers
    IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Security Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise55%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is ranked 7th in Patch Management with 12 reviews while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is ranked 3rd in Patch Management with 38 reviews. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus writes "Good scalability and a responsive tech support team ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Windows Server Update Services writes "Lets us manage all our organization's updates from a single management console". ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is most compared with BigFix, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Configuration Manager, GFI LanGuard and N-able N-central, whereas Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is most compared with BigFix, Quest KACE Systems Management, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and GFI LanGuard. See our ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services report.

    See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

    We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.