We performed a comparison between Matillion ETL and Qlik Replicate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The simplicity of this tool is nice. It has a good graphical user interface. You can also do a lot of generic stuff in the tool. If there is good connectivity to a cloud database, such as Snowflake, and you can have a lot of Snowflake functionality in the tool."
"The product has a good user interface."
"It is pretty user-friendly, even for people who aren't super technical."
"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is the ETL. The solution is open-source which provides advantages, such as good performance and high efficiency. Additionally, it supports three data types which eliminates predefining the data, and we can write script models in Python."
"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is its user-friendly graphical interface."
"It has helped us to get onto the cloud quickly."
"Matillion ETL has great Git integration that is perfect and convenient to use."
"The loading of data is the most valuable feature of Matillion ETL."
"It enables us to transform data at the latest stage rather than in ETL loads, so it's more ELT which is one of the advantages. It is also in near real-time, which brings significant advantage for our embedded analytics approach."
"Great with replicating and updating records."
"We use Qlik Replicate to change data capture of databases in production environments."
"It's very user-friendly when it comes to settings and configuration. It also offers very detailed logging about warnings and errors."
"The CDC and the flexibility to use QVD as a source are the most valuable features of Qlik Replicate."
"A pretty good series of connectors is one of the best features of Qlik Replicate."
"Support has been great."
"The most useful functions of Qlik Replicate are the data manipulation to transformations."
"Performance can be improved for efficiency, and it can be made faster."
"In the next release, we would like to have connections to more databases."
"Sometimes, we have issues with the solution's stability and need to restart it for three weeks or more."
"I am looking forward to seeing the expansion of the source range for their data loader product."
"It needs integration with more data sources."
"The current version is a bit more limited because it's on a virtual machine, and everything executes on that one virtual machine."
"The cost of the solution is high and could be reduced."
"To complete the pipeline, they might want to include some connectors which would put the data into different platforms. This would be helpful."
"It's not possible to replicate the QVC files in data analytics."
"In various scenarios, an important consideration is when we encounter issues and Qlik Replicate suggests reloading a specific table. If we face any problems or encounter errors with that table, it becomes necessary to make a change in Qlik Replicate. Performing a full reload every time is not feasible or practical. Instead, we should identify the specific issues and address them without repeating the entire reloading process. Based on this approach, we can investigate and resolve the problem by performing targeted loads from the source itself. This change aligns with my perspective and is something I would like to implement."
"Support for this product is not great. It needs to be improved."
"Some features can also be overly dependent on each other. So, there is room for improvement."
"In the next release, I would like to see closer integration with data catalyst."
"We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system."
"It would be better if the solution’s pricing were more obvious."
"Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement."
Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 24 reviews while Qlik Replicate is ranked 16th in Data Integration with 13 reviews. Matillion ETL is rated 8.6, while Qlik Replicate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qlik Replicate writes " Performs well with batch-wise data applications but some features can also be overly dependent on each other". Matillion ETL is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas Qlik Replicate is most compared with Oracle GoldenGate, AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Compose, Azure Data Factory and Quest SharePlex. See our Matillion ETL vs. Qlik Replicate report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
