MedSphere OpenVista vs Meditech Electronic Health Records comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Ranking
5th
out of 31 in EHR
Views
1,801
Comparisons
862
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
out of 31 in EHR
Views
180
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
OpenVista
Learn More
MedSphere
Video Not Available
Overview

Meditech's electronic health record connects care across every setting, enabling clinicians to provide higher quality care, with greater efficiency, to more people.

Medsphere's OpenVista is a portfolio of clinical products and services that leverages an electronic health record (EHR) system developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs. OpenVista, the most fully commercialized VistA offspring, is a responsible reapplication of the VAs $8.5 billion investment, which recent studies show have yielded billions in benefits, primarily from the near elimination of medication administration issues and duplicate testing.
Sample Customers
Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital
Lutheran Medical Center
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Healthcare Company32%
University10%
Government8%
Computer Software Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise68%
No Data Available

Meditech Electronic Health Records is ranked 5th in EHR while MedSphere OpenVista is ranked 12th in EHR. Meditech Electronic Health Records is rated 10.0, while MedSphere OpenVista is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Meditech Electronic Health Records is most compared with Cerner EMR, Epic Electronic Health Records, Allscripts Sunrise EHR, InterSystems TrakCare and Siemens Soarian, whereas MedSphere OpenVista is most compared with Epic Electronic Health Records.

See our list of best EHR vendors.

We monitor all EHR reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.