We performed a comparison between MEGA HOPEX and SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."The tool is very simple and intuitive to use."
"The most valuable feature for this solution is the automatic updating and propagation of changes across the system."
"We have many use cases for this solution but the feature I have found most valuable is the IT Portfolio Management module."
"This is a complete package with all of the functionality that we need."
"The most valuable parts of this solution are the richness of its features and its easy interface."
"MEGA offers a more integrated GRC platform to facilitate enhanced coordination between the functions of Risk, Compliance, and Internal Audit on a single platform solution - HOPEX."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"The most valuable feature of MEGA HOPEX is the publication method for static websites. You can generate the whole database into a static website. Additionally, in the new tabular entry, you don't have to put objects or links, you can go and fill a tab and the MEGA HOPEX will generate an object for you in a simple way."
"Traceability is a fantastic feature."
"Scalability can be a problem sometimes."
"The initial setup can be quite complex at first."
"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."
"In my experience, I've encountered difficulties with consuming custom packages in MEGA HOPEX, which leads to redundant work when deploying them to production. This is an area where improvement is needed. While version six offers better UI and UX, resolving this issue should be a priority. I believe it's important to fully explore MEGA HOPEX's capabilities before suggesting new ones."
"Standardization is lacking. The Operational Risk Function will be more effective if it at a default level follows established Basel standards for Loss categorization, Risk Assessments, Risk Event categorization, etc."
"Lacking more out of the box integrations."
"The initial setup is a little complex."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The algorithm is outdated and should be upgraded."
MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 36 reviews while SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer is ranked 18th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 1 review. MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8, while SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer writes "Great training available with traceability a key feature". MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and Avolution ABACUS, whereas SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer is most compared with SAP PowerDesigner.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.