We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The advantage of Microsoft Azure is its simplicity. It's easy to launch a project. However, the problem with this kind of solution is the reliability for the customers. You have to be sure to stay with Microsoft."
"The solution is secure and easy to use."
"Provisioning a server is fast, taking only one or two minutes before it is ready."
"It is a very easy-to-use platform, and it is very powerful in terms of data backup and Blob storage. It has very good features, especially if you are using Microsoft products, such as Windows, Microsoft SQL Server."
"Great features at a good price."
"The valuable features of Microsoft Azure are that it is cloud-based and has good storage. The storage is completely managed by Azure. We do not need to do any patching of security because it is handled by Azure which is a benefit. The solution is fully compatible with the Microsoft technology stack and is very scalable."
"It is a stable solution because it depends on the workload you expect. Based on that data, you can configure how many users it can handle."
"My experience with technical support so far is very good."
"It is a stable and scalable product."
"It is a scalable solution if you have a good cloud infrastructure."
"This solution is as good as any other S/4HANA SAP solution. The continuous support we get is very valuable."
"It has significantly streamlined our operations."
"My company has not had any problems with the product's initial setup phase."
"What I like the most is that we can convert databases into a proper multi-dimensional model, and then we can project with the integration with Power BI."
"The solution is stable and we have never had a problem. We started with one terabyte of data when the solution was first implemented and today we have around almost 600 gigabytes of data, which means means the compression works properly. Before migrating from ECC, we had nine terabytes of data."
"Ensuring data integrity across finance, supply chain, and other critical areas is paramount for real-time decision-making. Access to accurate and up-to-date information is essential for data protection. While the digital solution primarily serves basic maintenance, the ability to handle these core aspects efficiently is invaluable for your needs."
"Could be more user friendly; initial setup is difficult to understand."
"I have found Microsoft Azure has many components to use and it's very difficult to understand every component."
"Microsoft Azure could improve by being more secure."
"There were also a lot of constraints with the serverless parts."
"The level of authorization or authorization cascading can be improved. We have the most powerful admins and then we have sub-admins, but the level of authorization is not that easy to handle or manage."
"I would recommend some enhancement regarding integration features."
"The market place can be raised, and the CMT can be more sophisticated to create more opportunities for the end users."
"The solution could improve by providing a better user interface and more organized workflows."
"This product is not mature enough at this point in time."
"The only thing that could be improved is the cost."
"The solution is scalable from an infrastructure point of view. However, it becomes more complex over time because technology is changing so fast."
"The stability needs to be improved to be able to handle large amounts of data."
"I would rate the stability a four out of ten. It's an area that could use improvement"
"SAP support isn't on par with products like Microsoft Azure or AWS. It's nowhere close to the competitors."
"It’s a common challenge with applications like Microsoft and SAP that they tend to rely on engineers rather than human resources personnel for knowledge and implementation."
"Customers need to be better educated about using the solution's cloud for digital transformation."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 299 reviews while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is ranked 8th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 21 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud writes "High stability, reasonably priced, and important for digital transformations". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Amazon AWS, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Heroku, whereas SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is most compared with Amazon AWS, SAP S4HANA on AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and SAP Hybris on AWS. See our Microsoft Azure vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hi, It could be easy as Azure is one of the partners of SAP HEC.
Please contact your SAP HEC technical account manager who can guide you on this.
@Harraj Saraon, did you get your answer?