We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Virtuozzo Application Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's most valuable aspect is the account management side. This involves tasks such as assigning credentials to different individuals, managing user accounts, and implementing Privileged Access Management."
"The management part of it is good. Its UI is simple to use. The cost management and billing part is also good. These are the top things that I like in Azure."
"The most valuable feature is the possibility of using Microsoft and non-Microsoft services on one environment."
"Virtual machine services, in SaaS services, M365, and Data Lake are all popular with our clients."
"It has multiple features that can be used from the start."
"The solution is very simple to set up."
"If you have large traffic amounts, Microsoft Azure will continue to provide our customers with the best storage experience."
"Installation is easy as it's cloud-based. Performance is good. It's stable and scalable."
"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."
"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."
"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."
"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."
"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."
"In the next release, I would like to see better security."
"The solution could improve by simplifying network management."
"With Microsoft, our only concern is exchange rates because we're paying in dollars. It's very expensive for us because of the exchange rates. It would help if they partnered with someone locally so we can pay in our local currency."
"The documentation can be outdated and is not as clear in Microsoft Azure as it is in AWS or Google."
"Improvements are needed in Azure to enhance integration tools and support for effectively migrating and managing third-party dependencies."
"There are always new features to add in terms of additional indicators, improving the looks of the dashboard and stuff. There are some dashboards that are not attractive, we are looking to make them fancier and nice-looking."
"They should create integrations with more platforms."
"Technical support could be better. They need to be more responsive."
"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."
"Lacks better integration into enterprise storage products."
"The backup functionality needs to be improved."
"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."
"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."
More Virtuozzo Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 299 reviews while Virtuozzo Application Platform is ranked 15th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Virtuozzo Application Platform is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Virtuozzo Application Platform writes "A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup ". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Amazon AWS, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Virtuozzo Application Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, OpenShift, VMware Tanzu Application Service, SAP Cloud Platform and DigitalOcean. See our Microsoft Azure vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.