We performed a comparison between Microsoft Bitlocker and Symantec Endpoint Encryption based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison of Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Microsoft Bitlocker seems to be a superior solution. All other things being more or less equal, half of Symantec Endpoint Encryption reviewers found Symantec Endpoint Encryption to be difficult to deploy. Additionally, users of Symantec Endpoint Encryption find it difficult to upgrade. Finally, Symantec Endpoint Encryption’s users are not impressed with its technical support.
"The ease of administering and integrating the solution is great."
"There's a lot of manageability within the solution. This is very helpful."
"One significant aspect is that without the BitLocker key, you can't log in to the user's laptop. I appreciate the capability to encrypt the user's hard drive, ensuring access only with the recovery key. In an enterprise setup, we store all BitLocker keys on our server. So, whenever a user attempts to log in, the architecture authenticates with the key. This ensures that our data is secure. Even if the user's laptop is lost, we have confidence that the data remains inaccessible. So far, our user data is well-protected."
"Being able to encrypt an entire hard disk has been most valuable."
"It's a straightforward solution for encryption."
"It comes bundled with other Microsoft solutions."
"It's my understanding that the initial setup is straightforward."
"Microsoft BitLocker can be used to ensure that stolen PCs or laptops do not lose their data."
"We can extend it to all of the critical endpoints and the servers, and we can ensure the confidentiality of the data."
"The solution’s installation was easy."
"The solution is great for large-scale deployments."
"We use it for protecting accounts, which is its most valuable feature."
"The best feature of Symantec Endpoint Encryption is the encryption itself. Encryption truly is the way to go because nowadays we are living in an era of widespread server threats, and you need to encrypt your emails and documents because you never know who might get hold of them."
"The encryption feature is very good."
"The initial setup was easy."
"The most valuable feature is that it works in the background so that the end-users are not aware of what is happening on the laptop."
"They can improve the security of the application and include an encryption disk in the next feature."
"The integration between Active Directory and BitLocker could be better."
"The initial setup is complex."
"In future releases, I would like to see a feature where I can have a view of each device that has BitLocker to see if these machines are encrypted or not. So, I just want a view or a dashboard that can tell us so that I can remediate and add BitLocker to those systems or devices."
"The biggest one for us is revoking access. So, even though someone downloads something to a device, we want the ability to cloak that device or data and bring it back or make that data unusable for that person. Currently, BitLocker doesn't give us that ability. It basically encrypts it. We're seeing if identity management or IAM allows us to do that. We're kind of looking at third-party software that does that for us."
"I often have to make multiple attempts to log in."
"More customization options would have been nice, such as password selection, actions when the screen is locked, etc."
"I would like to be able to encrypt our cloud tenancy."
"They have too high of a price tag. That's why they're losing the market share."
"I think that they should improve the on-premises version to include the manageability and simplicity that is available on the cloud."
"The product can be expensive. Price was a factor in moving away from the product."
"I would like them to have integration with a wider range of non-Symantec products."
"It's difficult to integrate the solution with the DLP"
"The GUI could use some enhancement, particularly in making option sets easier to locate on client machines."
"The solution does not have endpoint control."
"I can only patch monthly. I don't know what the solution is there, besides being vulnerable for three weeks out of four. But there's got to be an option somehow."
Microsoft BitLocker is ranked 1st in Endpoint Encryption with 61 reviews while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is ranked 7th in Endpoint Encryption with 34 reviews. Microsoft BitLocker is rated 8.2, while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft BitLocker writes "User-friendly, easy to set up, and offers real-time machine status updates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Encryption writes "Provides a centralized management console and a straightforward initial setup process ". Microsoft BitLocker is most compared with ESET Endpoint Encryption, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption, WinMagic SecureDoc and Sophos SafeGuard, whereas Symantec Endpoint Encryption is most compared with McAfee Complete Data Protection, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Digital Guardian, WinMagic SecureDoc and ESET Endpoint Encryption. See our Microsoft BitLocker vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.