We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics AX and Microsoft Dynamics GP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One of the valuable features of the solution is how easy it is to use."
"There's a moderate amount of scalability available."
"Flexibility is the best feature. Because we have the source code, we can develop our ideas. It enables us to develop new functions."
"If anyone is familiar with Microsoft products then they can handle it easily."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is material planning."
"Dynamics AX provides a lot of functionality."
"The accounting and inventory management features are valuable."
"The product is easier to use and has more efficient workflow management features than other vendors."
"The stability was reliable."
"We have gained the capability to control and address various issues within the financial module effectively."
"The most valuable feature is financial control. The accounting aspect allows us to manage our clients and payments."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."
"The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. "
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations."
"You can track everything from beginning to end quite easily."
"It is being decommissioned."
"From a consultant's point of view, I recommend an enhancement in terms of detailed documentation for the products on the website."
"This solution could be improved with more expert resources and an easier implementation process."
"The product needs better admin control. There is room for improvement in flexibility, reporting, and dashboards. Artificial intelligence should be incorporated. I have concerns regarding partners, specifically in the implementation and deployment of Microsoft Dynamics."
"The integration could improve for the future."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX should include more connectors for third-party integrations. It should also include more features that AI models can govern."
"We experienced some challenges with the mobile apps due to the insufficient processing capacity to handle the workload effectively."
"There should be the capability for users to enhance the application by using a low-code or no-code product from the Microsoft family."
"The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved."
"As technology changes, I would say probably in the area of chart up account needs improvement because chart up account is a string. So if they make it more flexible."
"With payroll, the payroll that they have offers US or Canadian tax. However, here, our tax payments are different from the US and Canada. It is very difficult to put in our tax tables. We need some customization. It should be readily available for any country to use according to their tax implications. The system should know different types of tax regimes around the world so that it can accommodate. It's a little bit rigid on that."
"The biggest problem with GP is that it's not cloud based and it doesn't lend itself to subscription licensing. But Microsoft wants everything in the cloud and licensed on a subscription basis.Even tThough GP can be deployed on a cloud server, but basically, it's a Windows based product. It uses the older model and companies purchase the program and pay a 16-18 sixteen- eighteen percent annual renewal fee but Microsoft wants everybody to pay monthly or annual renewal fees on a subscription basis."
"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time."
"Initially, we encountered challenges, particularly with users transitioning from their previous applications."
"As for room for improvement, they have different modules, project and analytical accounting, but it will be good to have that kind of part in the standard package. To have that additional reporting functionality where you can add an attribute or something, which you can report again. So you can analyze the cost by not just natural accounts but also by a project, without having to go through another module edit on top and then the other module edit on top. The more modules you add, sometimes it doesn't work that well. Additionally, it would be easier to have the solution on the cloud. That's our consideration. We are trying to move all our systems to the cloud, and GP is one of them that we are going to move in the next couple of years. I would rate the solution seven or seven point five out of ten."
"It still can be improved in web-based and build reporting. "
Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 6th in ERP with 51 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked 13th in ERP with 22 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "A stable product that offers excellent ROI and reliable technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics GP writes "A user-friendly solution for accounting and sales purchase model with all options in one frame". Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, whereas Microsoft Dynamics GP is most compared with Oracle E-Business Suite, Epicor ERP, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA and Odoo. See our Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.