We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Just because I've been in the Azure space since it started out and in the Microsoft Cloud AD since the BPOS days in the early 2000s, and it's just a product that made life simpler for my clients to be able to integrate everything."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to delegate roles to each individual resource, which is great."
"The tool's most valuable features are security and integration with other tenants."
"Its ability to provide secure connections to people at all locations is the most valuable. It is mostly used by enterprises."
"I like Intune's MDM and MI."
"The two-factor authentication provides an additional layer of security for our organizational data, so Microsoft Authenticator plays a crucial role in making our confidential data more secure."
"Very stable and scalable IAM service with good SSO and authentication features."
"With Azure Conditional Access you can specify network locations where you want some of the services in the organization to be available to users, and where you don't want users to have access."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The solution is simple to use."
"Definitely, the price could be lower. When we moved from AWS to Azure, we started paying more."
"The thing that is a bit annoying is the inability to nest groups. Because we run an Azure hybrid model, we have nested groups on-premise which does not translate well. So, we have written some scripts to kind of work around that. This is a feature request that we have put in previously to be able to use a group that is nested in Active Directory on-premise and have it handled the same way in Azure."
"The solution could be cheaper."
"My only pain point in this solution is creating group membership for devices."
"Compatibility features for legacy system integration with new features will be challenging at times."
"I faced difficulties from Micorosft's end and during the transition from Microsoft Active Directory to Microsoft Entra ID. Sometimes, some of Microsoft's documentation could be a little outdated."
"Azure Active Directory could benefit by adding the capability for identity life cycle for the on-premise solution. For example, an HR solution, which is built on-premise or, in general, better on-premise capable solutions."
"The synchronization between my AD and Azure AD needs improvement."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 190 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 21st in Single Sign-On (SSO). Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Allows users to authenticate from home and has excellent integrations in a simple, stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco Duo and Yubico YubiKey, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Auth0. See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.