We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The most valuable features are the Domain Controller and the WBFS Manager."
"I like that ASP.NET is used for the framework and the core web services."
"Microsoft .NET Framework continually innovates, particularly in Visual Studio, which focuses on improving languages, debugging, and .NET functionality."
"I'd rate the solution as highly stable."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"A great solution for creating program solutions in a framework for Microsoft Windows quickly and easily."
"The solution's technical support is very good...The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The technology is very scalable and accessible to use."
"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."
"Internal workflow approval around ESS and MSS leave days, capex approval as well as internal communication to the business have improved the way my organization functions."
"Workflow functionality and internal portal capabilities are the most important features."
"They integrated it with the SAP router."
"They should try to improve their Blazor WebAssembly."
"The integration could improve in Microsoft .NET Framework."
"The runtime environment for ASP.NET needs improvement to make it more universal."
"This solution should include Power BI so that we don't have to use any third-party tools."
"Improvements are needed in .NET development, particularly in a backend scenario."
"It is of great concern to us that the solution is not very powerful on cross platform, at it impedes the ability to build and scale with it."
"Needs stronger security with respect to cloud issues."
"They could enhance support for Python within Visual Studio, as integrating Microsoft products with other frameworks can present a steep learning curve."
"External portal functionality with suppliers and customers needs improvement."
"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."
"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."
"Due to our business, some setups were very complex."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."
More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is ranked 21st in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal writes "The UI makes the setup easy to do from anywhere". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and NGINX Plus, whereas SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IBM DataPower Gateway.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.