Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs Oracle Database Appliance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and Oracle Database Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. Oracle Database Appliance Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The data transmissions between the data models is the most valuable feature.""The most valuable feature for me is querying.""I like Data Warehouse's data integrity features. Data integrity is what databases are made for as opposed to spreadsheets.""The solution's integration is good.""The solution has been reliable.""We can store the data in a data lake for a very low cost.""Data collection and reporting are valuable features of the solution.""Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time."

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pros →

"The Oracle database is able to get the data, process it, and return it to the company's CEO's and CFO's within a single day, and thus they are able to find out yesterday's P and L by today. It has drastically reduced the amount and time of processing from seven days to one day.""The solution is simple to use and easy to maintain.""I give it a nine out of 10 because it gives the customer easy access to a complete database solution within 30 minutes.""The product’s valuable feature is its capability to pre-configure and pre-install the settings.""The performance due to the all-flash of ODA is very nice.""Oracle Database Appliances are specifically designed for Oracle databases. They have built-in utilities and tools that simplify management, making them the best option for Oracle database management systems.""The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to combine all the data without the need for additional devices.""The product is very light."

More Oracle Database Appliance Pros →

Cons
"It could be made more user-friendly for business users which would increase the user base.""​Concurrent queries are limited to 32, making it more of a data storage mechanism instead of an active DWH solution.""In the future I would love to see a slightly better automation engine, just for the data integration layer, to make it slightly easier for end-users or junior developers to get involved in incremental updating.""I would like the ability to do more real-time type updates instead of batch-oriented updates.""We find the cost of the solution to be a little high.""The product does not have all of the features that the native products have.""Some compatibility issues occur during deployment, so we need to build the product from scratch for some features.""The feature updates on the on-premise solution come very slowly, and it would be great if they came faster."

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Cons →

"Oracle could improve its capacity for built-in visualization.""The tool's setup can be easier.""Oracle Database Appliance could improve by having better integration.""The product is quite complex to set up, initially. It would be ideal if it was simpler.""They could incorporate a more secure and internet-centric management system for the platform.""The main thing would be to make ODA more affordable, to make it a more economical machine. Also, I would like to see virtualization, so you could implement all of your functions on one machine. Finally, improvement in the speed and performance would be good.""In my opinion only one single command should be used for all ODA models, as it’s confusing.""Oracle Database Appliance patching comes out two to three months after the regular patching cycle."

More Oracle Database Appliance Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think the program is well-priced compared to the other offerings that are out in the market."
  • "Microsoft has an agreement with the government in our country, so our customers get their licensing costs from the Ministry. Whenever we work with any government, company, or government institute, which is mainly what we are doing, that license comes directly from the Ministry of Technology and Information."
  • "All the features that we use do not require any additional subscription or yearly fees."
  • "Technical support is an additional fee and is expensive."
  • "The solution's pricing is fairly decent for organizations with huge data sizes."
  • "The tool could be expensive if we need to manage a lot of data."
  • "They offer an annual subscription. The pricing depends on the size of the environments."
  • More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Get benefit from the capacity-on-demand features. License your cores according to your licenses."
  • "Leverage the Pay-As-You-Grow licensing, and consider using the ODA X6-2 S/M/L models also for SE2/SE."
  • "In regards to licensing, it is cheaper to maintain for Oracle applications, and it's an all-in-one solution."
  • "The price should be lower."
  • "You must pay for the license."
  • "The price of the solution should be less expensive. However, they will increase the price more."
  • "I don’t know ODA and alternative system prices. But Oracle the database license is quite expensive and a lot of my customers plan to migrate to open source databases like PostgreSQL."
  • "Compared to Oracle Exadata, Oracle Database Appliance is affordable."
  • More Oracle Database Appliance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time.
    Top Answer:They offer an annual subscription. The pricing depends on the size of the environments.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, the product requires rolling back to its previous version during a software update. This particular area could be enhanced.
    Top Answer:Oracle Database Appliance provides high stability.
    Top Answer:On a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is cheap and 10 is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing 7.5 or 8 out of 10.
    Top Answer:The solution’s pricing could be improved.
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 35 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    564
    Comparisons
    446
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    379
    Rating
    8.0
    6th
    out of 35 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    2,939
    Comparisons
    2,126
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft PDW, SQL Server Data Warehouse, Microsoft SQL Server Parallel Data Warehouse, MS Parallel Data Warehouse
    X5-2
    Learn More
    Overview

    The traditional structured relational data warehouse was never designed to handle the volume of exponential data growth, the variety of semi-structured and unstructured data types, or the velocity of real time data processing. Microsoft's SQL Server data warehouse solution integrates your traditional data warehouse with non-relational data and it can handle data of all sizes and types, with real-time performance.

    Oracle Database Appliance is the easiest and most affordable way for small or medium-size organizations to run Oracle databases and applications and is an ideal platform for remote and edge computing environments. Customers reduce Oracle Database deployment times and management workloads using a prebuilt integrated system with management automation. As demonstrated in IDC’s business value study (PDF), Oracle Database Appliance lets customers grow revenue and control costs, delivering up to a 498% return on investment (ROI) over five years.

    Sample Customers
    Auckland Transport, Erste Bank Group, Urban Software Institute, NJVC, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe
    LifeLock, Incarlopsa, Al Yusur Industrial Contracting
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Healthcare Company18%
    Pharma/Biotech Company12%
    Hospitality Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Insurance Company7%
    University6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Retailer11%
    Transportation Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. Oracle Database Appliance
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. Oracle Database Appliance and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is ranked 8th in Data Warehouse with 32 reviews while Oracle Database Appliance is ranked 6th in Data Warehouse with 40 reviews. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is rated 7.6, while Oracle Database Appliance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse writes "An easy to setup tool that allows its users to write stored procedure, making it a scalable product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Appliance writes "Simplifies database management tasks and provides high availability and disaster recovery". Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, SAP BW4HANA, Snowflake and VMware Tanzu Greenplum, whereas Oracle Database Appliance is most compared with Oracle Exadata, VMware Tanzu Greenplum, Dremio, Actian Ingres and Vertica. See our Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. Oracle Database Appliance report.

    See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.