Microsoft SMS vs Sonatype Nexus Repository comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
362 views|187 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Sonatype Logo
363 views|133 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft SMS and Sonatype Nexus Repository based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonatype, EMCO Software, Microsoft and others in Software Distribution.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has been working for us, and it has never been down so far."

More Microsoft SMS Pros →

"I onboarded .NET, then I onboarded JS. And about six or eight months back, I onboarded Python. And I am about to onboard Docker. The availability of integrations allows me to do this.""For us, the ability to do proxying and federations of repositories is very important. It gives us flexibility. We are the largest physics research laboratory in the world. With 12,000 people, we need to have good solutions to federate organizations inside our lab.""Sonatype Nexus Repository has a valuable internal scanner feature.""I have found managing the artifact features very useful.""The primary feature is that I now have the ability to provide a central platform for storing build artifacts; a concise way for any project team to store its build with us.""The most important feature of Nexus Repository Manager is the storing and sharing of components. For Nexus IQ, it's the scanning of projects and the rating of vulnerabilities and license violations that we may have in our products.""Navigation on the UI is easy and simple to understand.""If there are any issues in build security, it can pick them up straight away."

More Sonatype Nexus Repository Pros →

Cons
"Its dashboard can be improved and made a little bit better."

More Microsoft SMS Cons →

"Lacks an end-to-end solution for developers to sign and store an image.""We feel that if the product could be configured more easily through configuration files, instead of API calls and databases, that would make it easier to integrate with other DevOps tools. This is one of the hurdles that we encountered when we tried to integrate Nexus 3 with our OpenShift installation.""Particularly concerning OSF-type licenses, while they support a multitude of features, there's room for improvement in the single point transform, especially for grouping. It appears that currently, the grouping functionality is not robust, particularly for Docker images within a group. The support for this aspect seems to be contingent on the license type. For instance, with the Voss license type, there is a noticeable absence of support for this feature. This is an area that could benefit from enhancement in the upcoming updates.""When it comes to uploading NPM libraries, JavaScript dependencies libraries, it is a little bit of a convoluted process. They need to improve uploading libraries for NPM-type repositories.""I would like to see them build in some scanning features out-of-the-box, as opposed to only getting them by buying the add-ons of Nexus IQ Server. I would like to see some level of ability to filter in the tool itself, through scanning the binaries in there.""They should provide automation for adding container images and artifacts in compliance with security requirements.""We've had some challenges around the database they use. We've had some big outages and it's due to the fact that we haven't found the database they use is all that stable... We've had some really positive conversations with Sonatype around that and they've provided us with the support and special services to help us migrate off of that, on to another type of database platform which we have more control over.""[A] main feature that is missing in Nexus IQ is the ability to explore the history of the different reports that have been generated for a given product. For the time being, in the Nexus IQ UI, we are only able to browse the latest reports that have been generated for a given product. It would be really useful for us to be able to go back in time by browsing through the reports and to have a tool that would give us the evolution of the metrics."

More Sonatype Nexus Repository Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It comes free with the Microsoft account. We have a yearly agreement, and all products are covered under it."
  • More Microsoft SMS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "In my opinion, the pricing is very fair and very customer-oriented. It's much better than any other tool I have used so far."
  • "It seems like a fair price, based on other software solutions I've purchased."
  • "It's quite expensive. They are charging around $110 or $120 per user, per year. It's quite expensive in comparison to the other tools available in the market."
  • "Nexus Repository Manager Pro is quite affordable because it's about €100, per user, per year. Purchasing licenses was not really a big issue for us. Regarding Nexus IQ, it's much more expensive. We purchased 250 licenses and they cost us about €120,000."
  • "One of the challenges we had around licensing was how to deal with anonymous requests. According to the letter of the contract, an anonymous request consumes a license. We had to do some work to get over the fact that any anonymous interactions with the Repository product had to be put back to an end-user account."
  • "There were costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. The standard is free."
  • "The cost is managed by the client."
  • "I use the open-source version of the product, which is free of cost."
  • More Sonatype Nexus Repository Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Distribution solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Primarily, the extensive support for a wide range of packages is a crucial factor. The effectiveness of new-age package managers is often determined by the breadth of packages they can handle. In this… more »
    Top Answer:I use the open-source version of the product, which is free of cost.
    Top Answer:Particularly concerning OSF-type licenses, while they support a multitude of features, there's room for improvement in the single point transform, especially for grouping. It appears that currently… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    362
    Comparisons
    187
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    Views
    363
    Comparisons
    133
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    509
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Systems Management Server, MS SMS
    Nexus Repository, Nexus Repository Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    Shopfloor management solution that provides simple to understand, real time graphical view of work requirements set against the actual working capacity of the machine tools.
    Nexus Repository is powered by Repository Manager, the same technology engine found in our OSS version deployed at more than 100,000 organziations world-wide. It is Built on the shoulders of Maven, Repository Manager supports all popular component formats and brings your entire development organization together. It includes staging and release functionality that provides support for operations and quality assurance processes prior to production and gives you instant insight into potential component security, license, and quality issues, enabling teams to take corrective action early and quickly.
    Sample Customers
    Curtin University, MyCNX, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Kecioren Municipality, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing, Delphi Automotive, Turkcell, Arcoflex Automation Solutions, Atasun Optik
    Goldman Sachs, Toyota, Disney, Deutsche Bank
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Construction Company12%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Retailer7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Government11%
    Recreational Facilities/Services Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise48%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Sonatype Nexus Repository vs. Symantec Ghost Solution Suite
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonatype Nexus Repository vs. Symantec Ghost Solution Suite and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft SMS is ranked 4th in Software Distribution while Sonatype Nexus Repository is ranked 1st in Software Distribution with 15 reviews. Microsoft SMS is rated 8.0, while Sonatype Nexus Repository is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft SMS writes "Reliable, stable, and free with our subscription". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Nexus Repository writes "Vastly improved our whole release cycle; automated processes help to deliver code". Microsoft SMS is most compared with EMCO MSI Package Builder, whereas Sonatype Nexus Repository is most compared with JFrog Artifactory, Archiva, Bitbucket Data Center, Inedo ProGet and EMCO Remote Installer.

    See our list of best Software Distribution vendors.

    We monitor all Software Distribution reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.