We performed a comparison between Microsoft System Center and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."Good for managing and administering the infrastructure."
"We like Microsoft System Center's Operations Manager. That is primarily why we use it."
"Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked."
"The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features."
"The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features."
"It can generate KPIs and management reports with monthly presentations on activities and updating the environment (success and failure)."
"The solution is easily available. That's its most valuable aspect."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of configuration and the easy discovery of the environment."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Could be more user friendly."
"Something super important that we need is this integration via Intune Configuration Manager."
"The multi-tenancy support needs to be improved. We need to have the ability to manage several different environments from one central point of administration."
"Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports."
"The platform's performance could be improved. Additionally, its UI needs to be well-upgraded and work faster."
"Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft System Center is ranked 15th in Application Infrastructure with 17 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft System Center is rated 7.8, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft System Center writes "Good review of configurations, effective antivirus administration, and has weekly reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". Microsoft System Center is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.