We performed a comparison between Microsoft System Center and SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of configuration and the easy discovery of the environment."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked."
"System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment."
"The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features."
"The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features."
"Step-by-step documentation that clarifies the implementation procedure."
"Good for managing and administering the infrastructure."
"There are many features of the solution that are quite useful. For us, the most valuable aspect may be visibility."
"Most of the documentation is online, however, there are some gaps there. The product documentation still refers back to the 2012 Server. We're pretty much in 2022. There's a ten-year gap there."
"We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."
"They should have some customized solutions or internal development, then maybe it could be easier to use different solutions or some self-developed solution."
"Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement."
"Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports."
"In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times."
"Something super important that we need is this integration via Intune Configuration Manager."
"The solution's dashboard needs improvement."
"The solution could improve its user interface."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft System Center is ranked 15th in Application Infrastructure with 17 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is ranked 25th in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft System Center is rated 7.8, while SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft System Center writes "Good review of configurations, effective antivirus administration, and has weekly reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management writes "First Look – SAP NetWeaver Decision Service Management". Microsoft System Center is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is most compared with Azul Zulu.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.